2005-11-14 21:52:46

by Dave Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oops-tracing: mention digital photos

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:02:57PM -0800, Linux Kernel wrote:
> tree 849707fda27c41466eabae0119d6386826ddb7dc
> parent 113fab1386f0093602d9f48b424b945cafd3db23
> author Diego Calleja <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:07:40 -0800
> committer Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:14:17 -0800
>
> [PATCH] oops-tracing: mention digital photos
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Something I've found handy countless times when users do this..

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

--- linus/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt~ 2005-11-14 16:47:54.000000000 -0500
+++ linus/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt 2005-11-14 16:51:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ the disk is not available then you have
has restarted. Messy but it is the only option if you have not
planned for a crash. Alternatively, you can take a picture of
the screen with a digital camera - not nice, but better than
- nothing.
+ nothing. If the messages scroll off the top of the console, you
+ may find that booting with a higher resolution (eg, vga=791)
+ will allow you to read more of the text. (Caveat: This needs vesafb,
+ so won't help for 'early' oopses)

(2) Boot with a serial console (see Documentation/serial-console.txt),
run a null modem to a second machine and capture the output there


2005-11-14 21:56:34

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oops-tracing: mention digital photos

On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:02:57PM -0800, Linux Kernel wrote:
> > tree 849707fda27c41466eabae0119d6386826ddb7dc
> > parent 113fab1386f0093602d9f48b424b945cafd3db23
> > author Diego Calleja <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:07:40 -0800
> > committer Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:14:17 -0800
> >
> > [PATCH] oops-tracing: mention digital photos
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
>
> Something I've found handy countless times when users do this..
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

I've mentioned that a few times also (to bug reporters),
but your doc. is better than mine was.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

> --- linus/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt~ 2005-11-14 16:47:54.000000000 -0500
> +++ linus/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt 2005-11-14 16:51:02.000000000 -0500
> @@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ the disk is not available then you have
> has restarted. Messy but it is the only option if you have not
> planned for a crash. Alternatively, you can take a picture of
> the screen with a digital camera - not nice, but better than
> - nothing.
> + nothing. If the messages scroll off the top of the console, you
> + may find that booting with a higher resolution (eg, vga=791)
> + will allow you to read more of the text. (Caveat: This needs vesafb,
> + so won't help for 'early' oopses)
>
> (2) Boot with a serial console (see Documentation/serial-console.txt),
> run a null modem to a second machine and capture the output there
> -

--
~Randy

2005-11-15 08:58:08

by Qi Yong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oops-tracing: mention digital photos

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:56:03PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:02:57PM -0800, Linux Kernel wrote:
> > > tree 849707fda27c41466eabae0119d6386826ddb7dc
> > > parent 113fab1386f0093602d9f48b424b945cafd3db23
> > > author Diego Calleja <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:07:40 -0800
> > > committer Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:14:17 -0800
> > >
> > > [PATCH] oops-tracing: mention digital photos
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> >
> > Something I've found handy countless times when users do this..
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
>
> I've mentioned that a few times also (to bug reporters),
> but your doc. is better than mine was.

I had come up to this idea before too, but never tried it. The higher
resolution mode is ugly and fb was buggy at that time (not sure now).

I wonder if it's feasible to implement panic messages showing cyclically,
or better like more (1).

Coywolf