2005-12-11 14:13:06

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [patch -mm] fix SLOB on x64


this patch fixes 32-bitness bugs in mm/slob.c. Successfully booted x64
with SLOB enabled. (i have switched the PREEMPT_RT feature to use the
SLOB allocator exclusively, so it must work on all platforms)

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Index: linux/mm/slob.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slob.c
+++ linux/mm/slob.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void kfree(const void *block)
if (!block)
return;

- if (!((unsigned int)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
+ if (!((unsigned long)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
/* might be on the big block list */
spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
for (bb = bigblocks; bb; last = &bb->next, bb = bb->next) {
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ unsigned int ksize(const void *block)
if (!block)
return 0;

- if (!((unsigned int)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
+ if (!((unsigned long)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
for (bb = bigblocks; bb; bb = bb->next)
if (bb->pages == block) {
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ void kmem_cache_init(void)
void *p = slob_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, 0, PAGE_SIZE-1);

if (p)
- free_page((unsigned int)p);
+ free_page((unsigned long)p);

mod_timer(&slob_timer, jiffies + HZ);
}


2005-12-11 17:22:36

by Ed Tomlinson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] fix SLOB on x64

On Sunday 11 December 2005 09:12, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this patch fixes 32-bitness bugs in mm/slob.c. Successfully booted x64
> with SLOB enabled. (i have switched the PREEMPT_RT feature to use the
> SLOB allocator exclusively, so it must work on all platforms)

Its a good idea to get this working everywhere. Why have you switched to
use SLOB exclusively?

Thanks
Ed Tomlinson

2005-12-11 18:11:58

by Matt Mackall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] fix SLOB on x64

On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> this patch fixes 32-bitness bugs in mm/slob.c. Successfully booted x64
> with SLOB enabled. (i have switched the PREEMPT_RT feature to use the
> SLOB allocator exclusively, so it must work on all platforms)

The patch looks fine, but what's this about using SLOB exclusively?
Fragmentation performance of SLOB is miserable on anything like a
modern desktop, I think SLOB only makes sense for small machines. The
locking also suggests dual core at most.

Anyway,

> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
>
> Index: linux/mm/slob.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/slob.c
> +++ linux/mm/slob.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void kfree(const void *block)
> if (!block)
> return;
>
> - if (!((unsigned int)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
> + if (!((unsigned long)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
> /* might be on the big block list */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
> for (bb = bigblocks; bb; last = &bb->next, bb = bb->next) {
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ unsigned int ksize(const void *block)
> if (!block)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!((unsigned int)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
> + if (!((unsigned long)block & (PAGE_SIZE-1))) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&block_lock, flags);
> for (bb = bigblocks; bb; bb = bb->next)
> if (bb->pages == block) {
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ void kmem_cache_init(void)
> void *p = slob_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, 0, PAGE_SIZE-1);
>
> if (p)
> - free_page((unsigned int)p);
> + free_page((unsigned long)p);
>
> mod_timer(&slob_timer, jiffies + HZ);
> }

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

2005-12-11 20:02:59

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] fix SLOB on x64


* Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > this patch fixes 32-bitness bugs in mm/slob.c. Successfully booted x64
> > with SLOB enabled. (i have switched the PREEMPT_RT feature to use the
> > SLOB allocator exclusively, so it must work on all platforms)
>
> The patch looks fine, but what's this about using SLOB exclusively?
> Fragmentation performance of SLOB is miserable on anything like a
> modern desktop, I think SLOB only makes sense for small machines. The
> locking also suggests dual core at most.

well, this is only an -rt artifact: the SLOB needs zero modifications to
work on PREEMPT_RT, while SLAB needed a risky 66K monster patch. Until
someone simplifies the SLAB conversion to PREEMPT_RT, i'll use the SLOB.

i havent noticed any significant slowdown due to the SLOB. In any case,
we'll give it some workout which should further speed up its upstream
integration - it's looking good so far.

Ingo

2005-12-11 20:06:22

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] fix SLOB on x64


* Ed Tomlinson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sunday 11 December 2005 09:12, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > this patch fixes 32-bitness bugs in mm/slob.c. Successfully booted x64
> > with SLOB enabled. (i have switched the PREEMPT_RT feature to use the
> > SLOB allocator exclusively, so it must work on all platforms)
>
> Its a good idea to get this working everywhere. Why have you switched
> to use SLOB exclusively?

because the SLAB hacks were getting ugly, and i gave up on it during the
2.6.15-rc5 merge. (The SLAB code has lots of irqs-off / per-cpu and
non-preempt assumptions integrated, which were a pain to sort out.)

We'll eventually do a cleaner conversion of SLAB to PREEMPT_RT, but for
now the SLOB is turned on exclusively if PREEMPT_RT. (in other
preemption modes it's optionally selectable if EMBEDDED is enabled)

Ingo