Arnd Bergmann writes:
> We need access to some symbols in powerpc memory management
> from spufs in order to create proper SLB entries.
I don't like exporting low-level implementation details like this, and
it seems a bit bogus to have an SLB miss handler in a module. Could
you move the SLB miss handler to the non-modular part?
Regards,
Paul.
On Friday 05 May 2006 07:56, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> I don't like exporting low-level implementation details like this, and
> it seems a bit bogus to have an SLB miss handler in a module. ?Could
> you move the SLB miss handler to the non-modular part?
Yes. The series already has the patches to move the SLB miss handler
into the built-in parts. At the moment, we also need the symbols for
the context switch code that also touches the SLB entries. We already
have a patch to move that as well, but are still discussing the details
of that.
I'll follow up with a patch to replace this one.
Arnd <><