If you call set_personality() with an expression such as:
set_personality(foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2);
then this evaluates to:
((current->personality == foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2) ? ...
which is obviously not the intended result. Add the missing parents
to ensure this gets evaluated as expected:
((current->personality == (foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2)) ? ...
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
diff --git a/include/linux/personality.h b/include/linux/personality.h
index bf4cf20..012cd55 100644
--- a/include/linux/personality.h
+++ b/include/linux/personality.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ #define get_personality (current->perso
* Change personality of the currently running process.
*/
#define set_personality(pers) \
- ((current->personality == pers) ? 0 : __set_personality(pers))
+ ((current->personality == (pers)) ? 0 : __set_personality(pers))
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core