2006-12-18 18:11:53

by Ed L. Cashin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.19.1] fix aoe without scatter-gather [Bug 7662]

The patch below fixes a bug that only appears when AoE goes over a
network card that does not support scatter-gather. The headers in the
linear part of the skb appeared to be larger than they really were,
resulting in data that was offset by 24 bytes.

This patch eliminates the offset data on cards that don't support
scatter-gather or have had scatter-gather turned off. There remains
an unrelated issue that I'll address in a separate email.

Signed-off-by: "Ed L. Cashin" <[email protected]>

diff -uprN linux-2.6.19.orig/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c linux-2.6.19.mod/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c 2006-12-11 18:15:42.322711000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19.mod/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c 2006-12-12 17:12:59.307200500 -0500
@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ new_skb(ulong len)
skb->nh.raw = skb->mac.raw = skb->data;
skb->protocol = __constant_htons(ETH_P_AOE);
skb->priority = 0;
- skb_put(skb, len);
- memset(skb->head, 0, len);
skb->next = skb->prev = NULL;

/* tell the network layer not to perform IP checksums
@@ -122,8 +120,8 @@ aoecmd_ata_rw(struct aoedev *d, struct f
skb = f->skb;
h = (struct aoe_hdr *) skb->mac.raw;
ah = (struct aoe_atahdr *) (h+1);
- skb->len = sizeof *h + sizeof *ah;
- memset(h, 0, ETH_ZLEN);
+ skb_put(skb, sizeof *h + sizeof *ah);
+ memset(h, 0, skb->len);
f->tag = aoehdr_atainit(d, h);
f->waited = 0;
f->buf = buf;
@@ -149,7 +147,6 @@ aoecmd_ata_rw(struct aoedev *d, struct f
skb->len += bcnt;
skb->data_len = bcnt;
} else {
- skb->len = ETH_ZLEN;
writebit = 0;
}

@@ -206,6 +203,7 @@ aoecmd_cfg_pkts(ushort aoemajor, unsigne
printk(KERN_INFO "aoe: skb alloc failure\n");
continue;
}
+ skb_put(skb, sizeof *h + sizeof *ch);
skb->dev = ifp;
if (sl_tail == NULL)
sl_tail = skb;
@@ -243,6 +241,7 @@ freeframe(struct aoedev *d)
continue;
if (atomic_read(&skb_shinfo(f->skb)->dataref) == 1) {
skb_shinfo(f->skb)->nr_frags = f->skb->data_len = 0;
+ skb_trim(f->skb, 0);
return f;
}
n++;
@@ -698,8 +697,8 @@ aoecmd_ata_id(struct aoedev *d)
skb = f->skb;
h = (struct aoe_hdr *) skb->mac.raw;
ah = (struct aoe_atahdr *) (h+1);
- skb->len = ETH_ZLEN;
- memset(h, 0, ETH_ZLEN);
+ skb_put(skb, sizeof *h + sizeof *ah);
+ memset(h, 0, skb->len);
f->tag = aoehdr_atainit(d, h);
f->waited = 0;



--
Ed L Cashin <[email protected]>


2006-12-18 22:21:59

by Ed L. Cashin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: bio pages with zero page reference count

(This email is a followup to "Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1] fix aoe without
scatter-gather [Bug 7662]".)

On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:53:00PM -0500, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
...
> This patch eliminates the offset data on cards that don't support
> scatter-gather or have had scatter-gather turned off. There remains
> an unrelated issue that I'll address in a separate email.

After fixing the problem with the skb headers, we noticed that there
were still problems when scatter gather wasn't in use. XFS was giving
us bios that had pages with a reference count of zero.

The aoe driver sets up the skb with the frags pointing to the pages,
and when scatter gather isn't supported and __pskb_pull_tail gets
involved, put_page is called after the data is copied from the pages.
That causes problems because of the zero page reference count.

It seems like it would always be incorrect for one part of the kernel
to give pages with a zero reference count to another part of the
kernel, so this seems like a bug in XFS.

Christoph Hellwig, though, points out,

> It's a kmalloced page. The same can happen with ext3 aswell, but
> only when doing log recovery. The last time this came up (vs
> iscsi) the conclusion was that the driver needs to handle this
> case.

In attempting to find the conversation he was referencing, I only
found this:

Subject: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
Date: 2005-04-25 17:02:59 GMT
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/298377

If anyone has a better reference, I'd like to see it.

--
Ed L Cashin <[email protected]>

2006-12-18 22:53:46

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: bio pages with zero page reference count

On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:21:09PM -0500, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
> (This email is a followup to "Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1] fix aoe without
> scatter-gather [Bug 7662]".)
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:53:00PM -0500, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
> ...
> > This patch eliminates the offset data on cards that don't support
> > scatter-gather or have had scatter-gather turned off. There remains
> > an unrelated issue that I'll address in a separate email.
>
> After fixing the problem with the skb headers, we noticed that there
> were still problems when scatter gather wasn't in use. XFS was giving
> us bios that had pages with a reference count of zero.
>
> The aoe driver sets up the skb with the frags pointing to the pages,
> and when scatter gather isn't supported and __pskb_pull_tail gets
> involved, put_page is called after the data is copied from the pages.
> That causes problems because of the zero page reference count.
>
> It seems like it would always be incorrect for one part of the kernel
> to give pages with a zero reference count to another part of the
> kernel, so this seems like a bug in XFS.
>
> Christoph Hellwig, though, points out,
>
> > It's a kmalloced page. The same can happen with ext3 aswell, but
> > only when doing log recovery. The last time this came up (vs
> > iscsi) the conclusion was that the driver needs to handle this
> > case.
>
> In attempting to find the conversation he was referencing, I only
> found this:
>
> Subject: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
> Date: 2005-04-25 17:02:59 GMT
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/298377
>
> If anyone has a better reference, I'd like to see it.

I searched around a little bit and found these:

http://groups.google.at/group/open-iscsi/browse_frm/thread/17fbe253cf1f69dd/f26cf19b0fee9147?tvc=1&q=kmalloc+iscsi+%22christoph+hellwig%22&hl=de#f26cf19b0fee9147
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.3/0061.html

But that's not the conclusion I was looking for.

2007-01-19 16:24:09

by Ed L. Cashin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Re: bio pages with zero page reference count

On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:53:43PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:21:09PM -0500, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
...
> > If anyone has a better reference, I'd like to see it.
>
> I searched around a little bit and found these:
>
> http://groups.google.at/group/open-iscsi/browse_frm/thread/17fbe253cf1f69dd/f26cf19b0fee9147?tvc=1&q=kmalloc+iscsi+%22christoph+hellwig%22&hl=de#f26cf19b0fee9147
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.3/0061.html
>
> But that's not the conclusion I was looking for.

So it sounds like you've been advocating a general discussion of this
issue for a few years now.

To summarize the issue:

1) users of the block layer assume that it's fine to associate pages
that have a zero reference count with a bio before requesting
I/O,

2) intermediaries like iscsi, aoe, and drbd, associate the pages
with the frags of skbuffs, but

3) when the network layer has to linearize the skbuff for a network
device that doesn't support scatter gather, it winds up doing a
get_page and put_page on each page in the frags, despite the fact
that the page reference count on each may already be zero. The
network layer is assuming that it's OK to do use these operations
on any page in the frags.

Maybe the discussion is slow to start because too many parts of the
kernel are involved. Here are a couple of specific questions. Maybe
they'll help get the ball rolling.

1) What are the disadvantages of making the network layer *not*
to assume it's correct to use get/put_page on the frags when it
linearizes an sk_buff?

For example, the network layer could omit the get/put_page when
the page reference count is zero.

2) What are the disadvantages of having one part of the kernel (e.g.,
XFS) reference a page before handing it off to another part of the
kernel, e.g., in a bio?

This change would require multiple parts of the kernel to change
behavior, but it seems conceptually cleaner, since the reference
count would reflect the reality that the page does have an owner
(XFS or whoever). I don't know how practical the implementation
would be.

3) It seems messy to handle this is in each of the individual
intermediary drivers that sit between the block and network
layers, but if that really is the place to do it, then is there a
problem with simply incrementing the page reference counts upon
getting a bio from the block layer, and later decrementing them
before giving them back with bio_endio?

bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i)
atomic_inc(&bv->bv_page->_count);

... [and later]

bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i)
atomic_dec(&bv->bv_page->_count);

bio_endio(bio, bytes_done, error);

That seems to eliminate problems aoe users have with XFS on AoE
devices that are accessible via network devices that don't support
scatter gather, but is it the right fix?

Andrew Morton changed "count" to "_count" to stop folks from
directly manipulating the page struct member, but I don't see any
get/put_page type operations that fit what the aoe driver has to
do in this case.

--
Ed L Cashin <[email protected]>