This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.3 release.
There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email [email protected]
to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
also email us.
Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
Anything received after that time might be too late.
thanks,
the -stable release team
--
* Chris Wright ([email protected]) wrote:
> Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)
And the roll-up will be available at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.3-rc1.{gz,bz2}
once mirroring finishes.
thanks,
-chris
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote:
> * Chris Wright ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
>
> Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)
>
> And the roll-up will be available at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.3-rc1.{gz,bz2}
>
> once mirroring finishes.
Shouldn't this apply cleanly to 2.6.19? I get
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv6/addrconf.c.rej
---
~Randy
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:08:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > * Chris Wright ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
> >
> > Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)
> >
> > And the roll-up will be available at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.3-rc1.{gz,bz2}
> >
> > once mirroring finishes.
>
> Shouldn't this apply cleanly to 2.6.19? I get
>
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv6/addrconf.c.rej
The -rc's usually apply to the previously released -stable (.2 in this case).
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 08:36:23 -0500 Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:08:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > > * Chris Wright ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
> > >
> > > Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)
> > >
> > > And the roll-up will be available at:
> > >
> > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.3-rc1.{gz,bz2}
> > >
> > > once mirroring finishes.
> >
> > Shouldn't this apply cleanly to 2.6.19? I get
> >
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv6/addrconf.c.rej
>
> The -rc's usually apply to the previously released -stable (.2 in this case).
Oh. Thanks, that works. "usually"? but not always? :)
---
~Randy