On Wednesday 21 February 2007 00:41, [email protected] wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
>
> Subject: x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should
> be accepted
>
> to the 2.6.18-stable tree. Its filename is
Since you are still maintaining 2.6.18, I've just sent another patch for that,
i.e. the backport of commit 14679eb3c50897889ba62f9a37e3bcd8a205b5e7.
Could you still merge it in this release, especially since this is the last
2.6.18-stable you are doing?
Also, this patch should also be merged in 2.6.20, but I saw no mail about
this, so I wanted to make sure it's heading there too.
> x86_64-fix-2.6.18-regression-ptrace_oldsetoptions-should-be-accepted.patch
>
> A git repo of this tree can be found at
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/stable-queue.git;a=sum
>mary
Hmm, this should be (note the missing gregkh in the path):
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list!
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:43:42PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 00:41, [email protected] wrote:
> > This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
> >
> > Subject: x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should
> > be accepted
> >
> > to the 2.6.18-stable tree. Its filename is
>
> Since you are still maintaining 2.6.18, I've just sent another patch for that,
> i.e. the backport of commit 14679eb3c50897889ba62f9a37e3bcd8a205b5e7.
> Could you still merge it in this release, especially since this is the last
> 2.6.18-stable you are doing?
Ok, I'll add it, thanks.
> Also, this patch should also be merged in 2.6.20, but I saw no mail about
> this, so I wanted to make sure it's heading there too.
If you sent it to me, it's still in my queue, I have a lot of
2.6.20-stable stuff to catch up on still...
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:43:42PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 00:41, [email protected] wrote:
> > This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
> >
> > Subject: x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should
> > be accepted
> >
> > to the 2.6.18-stable tree. Its filename is
>
> Since you are still maintaining 2.6.18, I've just sent another patch for that,
> i.e. the backport of commit 14679eb3c50897889ba62f9a37e3bcd8a205b5e7.
> Could you still merge it in this release, especially since this is the last
> 2.6.18-stable you are doing?
> Also, this patch should also be merged in 2.6.20, but I saw no mail about
> this, so I wanted to make sure it's heading there too.
>
> > x86_64-fix-2.6.18-regression-ptrace_oldsetoptions-should-be-accepted.patch
> >
> > A git repo of this tree can be found at
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/stable-queue.git;a=sum
> >mary
>
> Hmm, this should be (note the missing gregkh in the path):
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
Ah, good point, I'll go change my script that generates this, thanks for
pointing it out.
greg k-h