On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0400 Alan Cox
<[email protected]> wrote:
the patch itself appears to be wrapped and
>mangled
>and is not suitable for application.
I just verified that several patches I've submitted since 8/10 hit
this same issue due to *some* recent change on the server side of
my mail client.
Will resubmit after resolving issue w/ mail provider...
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / [email protected]
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0400 Alan Cox
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> the patch itself appears to be wrapped and
>> mangled
>> and is not suitable for application.
>
> I just verified that several patches I've submitted since 8/10 hit
> this same issue due to *some* recent change on the server side of
> my mail client.
>
> Will resubmit after resolving issue w/ mail provider...
It's highly unlikely that the server side would wrap email.
Jeff
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:00:28 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>It's highly unlikely that the server side would wrap email.
>
> Jeff
Heard back from hushmail support --
"Outgoing mail is currently wrapping at 68 characters for new mail,
and
64 chars for replies. This is to ensure that digital signatures
retain
the correct format for the recipient to be able to verify."
.... and no way to change from w/in any hushmail client. just
attempted similar thing with a yahoo account and was able to
resolve this issue, so all hushmail users can be warned that
wordwrapping will be an issue on patch submission and another route
will be required.
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / [email protected]
---------------------------------------