2007-10-24 03:39:46

by Grant Likely

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mpc5200: psc-spi driver must not touch port_config or cdm registers

From: Grant Likely <[email protected]>

port_config and the cdm are the responsibility of firmware; and if
firmware doesn't set it up correctly, it should be fixed up by
platform code on a per-board basis because it's a property of the
board.

Drivers should never touch these registers. They are completely
unprotected and the platform may do odd things with them that the
driver must not interfere with.

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
---

Domen, Dragos; can you please check your usage of this driver. None of
the in-tree board ports use it as-is, but they are of course just a
device tree change away from being usable on the lite5200b.

Board ports that use it need to be modified to make the cdm/port_config
changes in firmware (prefered) or in arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/<board>.c

Cheers,
g.

drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c | 77 +----------------------------------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c
index 7051e6c..ec3a618 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c
@@ -328,78 +328,15 @@ static void mpc52xx_psc_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
kfree(spi->controller_state);
}

-static int mpc52xx_psc_spi_port_config(int psc_id, struct mpc52xx_psc_spi *mps)
+static void mpc52xx_psc_spi_config(int psc_id, struct mpc52xx_psc_spi *mps)
{
- struct mpc52xx_cdm __iomem *cdm;
- struct mpc52xx_gpio __iomem *gpio;
struct mpc52xx_psc __iomem *psc = mps->psc;
- u32 ul;
u32 mclken_div;
- int ret = 0;
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_MERGE)
- cdm = mpc52xx_find_and_map("mpc5200-cdm");
- gpio = mpc52xx_find_and_map("mpc5200-gpio");
-#else
- cdm = ioremap(MPC52xx_PA(MPC52xx_CDM_OFFSET), MPC52xx_CDM_SIZE);
- gpio = ioremap(MPC52xx_PA(MPC52xx_GPIO_OFFSET), MPC52xx_GPIO_SIZE);
-#endif
- if (!cdm || !gpio) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Error mapping CDM/GPIO\n");
- ret = -EFAULT;
- goto unmap_regs;
- }

/* default sysclk is 512MHz */
mclken_div = 0x8000 |
(((mps->sysclk ? mps->sysclk : 512000000) / MCLK) & 0x1FF);

- switch (psc_id) {
- case 1:
- ul = in_be32(&gpio->port_config);
- ul &= 0xFFFFFFF8;
- ul |= 0x00000006;
- out_be32(&gpio->port_config, ul);
- out_be16(&cdm->mclken_div_psc1, mclken_div);
- ul = in_be32(&cdm->clk_enables);
- ul |= 0x00000020;
- out_be32(&cdm->clk_enables, ul);
- break;
- case 2:
- ul = in_be32(&gpio->port_config);
- ul &= 0xFFFFFF8F;
- ul |= 0x00000060;
- out_be32(&gpio->port_config, ul);
- out_be16(&cdm->mclken_div_psc2, mclken_div);
- ul = in_be32(&cdm->clk_enables);
- ul |= 0x00000040;
- out_be32(&cdm->clk_enables, ul);
- break;
- case 3:
- ul = in_be32(&gpio->port_config);
- ul &= 0xFFFFF0FF;
- ul |= 0x00000600;
- out_be32(&gpio->port_config, ul);
- out_be16(&cdm->mclken_div_psc3, mclken_div);
- ul = in_be32(&cdm->clk_enables);
- ul |= 0x00000080;
- out_be32(&cdm->clk_enables, ul);
- break;
- case 6:
- ul = in_be32(&gpio->port_config);
- ul &= 0xFF8FFFFF;
- ul |= 0x00700000;
- out_be32(&gpio->port_config, ul);
- out_be16(&cdm->mclken_div_psc6, mclken_div);
- ul = in_be32(&cdm->clk_enables);
- ul |= 0x00000010;
- out_be32(&cdm->clk_enables, ul);
- break;
- default:
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto unmap_regs;
- }
-
/* Reset the PSC into a known state */
out_8(&psc->command, MPC52xx_PSC_RST_RX);
out_8(&psc->command, MPC52xx_PSC_RST_TX);
@@ -421,14 +358,6 @@ static int mpc52xx_psc_spi_port_config(int psc_id, struct mpc52xx_psc_spi *mps)
out_8(&psc->ctlr, 0x84);

mps->bits_per_word = 8;
-
-unmap_regs:
- if (cdm)
- iounmap(cdm);
- if (gpio)
- iounmap(gpio);
-
- return ret;
}

static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_psc_spi_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
@@ -493,9 +422,7 @@ static int __init mpc52xx_psc_spi_do_probe(struct device *dev, u32 regaddr,
if (ret)
goto free_master;

- ret = mpc52xx_psc_spi_port_config(master->bus_num, mps);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto free_irq;
+ mpc52xx_psc_spi_config(master->bus_num, mps);

spin_lock_init(&mps->lock);
init_completion(&mps->done);


2007-10-24 05:25:17

by Domen Puncer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpc5200: psc-spi driver must not touch port_config or cdm registers

On 23/10/07 21:39 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
>
> port_config and the cdm are the responsibility of firmware; and if
> firmware doesn't set it up correctly, it should be fixed up by
> platform code on a per-board basis because it's a property of the
> board.
>
> Drivers should never touch these registers. They are completely
> unprotected and the platform may do odd things with them that the
> driver must not interfere with.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Domen, Dragos; can you please check your usage of this driver. None of
> the in-tree board ports use it as-is, but they are of course just a
> device tree change away from being usable on the lite5200b.

My test cases were just a jumper on RX-TX line.

It's not even allowed to set mclken_div_pscX?
There can be different speed devices on same SPI
(spi_board_info->max_speed_hz).

>
> Board ports that use it need to be modified to make the cdm/port_config
> changes in firmware (prefered) or in arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/<board>.c
>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
> drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c | 77 +----------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c
> index 7051e6c..ec3a618 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/mpc52xx_psc_spi.c
> @@ -328,78 +328,15 @@ static void mpc52xx_psc_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
> kfree(spi->controller_state);
> }
>
> -static int mpc52xx_psc_spi_port_config(int psc_id, struct mpc52xx_psc_spi *mps)
> +static void mpc52xx_psc_spi_config(int psc_id, struct mpc52xx_psc_spi *mps)
> {
> - struct mpc52xx_cdm __iomem *cdm;
> - struct mpc52xx_gpio __iomem *gpio;
> struct mpc52xx_psc __iomem *psc = mps->psc;
> - u32 ul;
> u32 mclken_div;
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_MERGE)
> - cdm = mpc52xx_find_and_map("mpc5200-cdm");
> - gpio = mpc52xx_find_and_map("mpc5200-gpio");
> -#else
> - cdm = ioremap(MPC52xx_PA(MPC52xx_CDM_OFFSET), MPC52xx_CDM_SIZE);
> - gpio = ioremap(MPC52xx_PA(MPC52xx_GPIO_OFFSET), MPC52xx_GPIO_SIZE);
> -#endif
> - if (!cdm || !gpio) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Error mapping CDM/GPIO\n");
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> - goto unmap_regs;
> - }
>
> /* default sysclk is 512MHz */
> mclken_div = 0x8000 |
> (((mps->sysclk ? mps->sysclk : 512000000) / MCLK) & 0x1FF);

It's actually 528e6, and mclken_div doesn't seem to be used anywhere anymore.

>
> - switch (psc_id) {
> - case 1:
...


Domen

2007-10-24 05:27:30

by Grant Likely

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpc5200: psc-spi driver must not touch port_config or cdm registers

On 10/23/07, Domen Puncer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/10/07 21:39 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> >
> > port_config and the cdm are the responsibility of firmware; and if
> > firmware doesn't set it up correctly, it should be fixed up by
> > platform code on a per-board basis because it's a property of the
> > board.
> >
> > Drivers should never touch these registers. They are completely
> > unprotected and the platform may do odd things with them that the
> > driver must not interfere with.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Domen, Dragos; can you please check your usage of this driver. None of
> > the in-tree board ports use it as-is, but they are of course just a
> > device tree change away from being usable on the lite5200b.
>
> My test cases were just a jumper on RX-TX line.
>
> It's not even allowed to set mclken_div_pscX?
> There can be different speed devices on same SPI
> (spi_board_info->max_speed_hz).

Nope; do it in the platform code or a cdm driver. Otherwise there is
no protection against collisions on the cdm registers. The driver
could call a platform hook to fiddle with clocking, but it must not
touch it directly.

(BTW, I don't intended to push this version of the patch; I just want
to get everyone's brain juices flowing to figure out the best way to
solve it.)

Cheers,
g.

--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
[email protected]
(403) 399-0195