2007-11-06 11:48:55

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: UML defconfig building failed again


Hi, Jeff!

I used today's linus-tree and defconfig to compile uml, but it failed. Error messages are
things like:

In file included from include/asm/processor-generic.h:13,
from include/asm/processor.h:77,
from include/asm/thread_info.h:11,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
from include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
from include/linux/time.h:8,
from include/linux/timex.h:57,
from include/linux/sched.h:53,
from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: ‘struct user_fxsr_struct’ declared inside parameter list
include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
include/asm/ptrace.h:52: warning: ‘struct user_fxsr_struct’ declared inside parameter list
In file included from include/linux/timer.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:87,
from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
include/linux/ktime.h: In function ‘ktime_set’:
include/linux/ktime.h:84: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type

{snip}

It seems like CONFIG_X86_32 was not set. Any ideas?

Thanks.



2007-11-06 14:11:56

by Al Viro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: UML defconfig building failed again

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:46:02PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>
> Hi, Jeff!
>
> I used today's linus-tree and defconfig to compile uml, but it failed. Error messages are
> things like:
>
> In file included from include/asm/processor-generic.h:13,
> from include/asm/processor.h:77,
> from include/asm/thread_info.h:11,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
> from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
> from include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
> from include/linux/time.h:8,
> from include/linux/timex.h:57,
> from include/linux/sched.h:53,
> from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
> from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: ???struct user_fxsr_struct??? declared inside parameter list
> include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> include/asm/ptrace.h:52: warning: ???struct user_fxsr_struct??? declared inside parameter list
> In file included from include/linux/timer.h:5,
> from include/linux/sched.h:87,
> from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
> from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> include/linux/ktime.h: In function ???ktime_set???:
> include/linux/ktime.h:84: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
>
> {snip}
>
> It seems like CONFIG_X86_32 was not set. Any ideas?

Sigh... Kbuild breakage this time... See if %s/\<[AC]FLAGS\>/KBUILD_&/g
in arch/um/Makefile-i386 helps.

2007-11-06 16:04:18

by Jeff Dike

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: UML defconfig building failed again

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:11:43PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Sigh... Kbuild breakage this time... See if %s/\<[AC]FLAGS\>/KBUILD_&/g
> in arch/um/Makefile-i386 helps.

Yup, this fixes it:


[AC]FLAGS -> KBUILD_[AC]FLAGS conversion in Makefile-i386.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
---
arch/um/Makefile-i386 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile-i386 b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
index b01dfb0..6729011 100644
--- a/arch/um/Makefile-i386
+++ b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ export LDFLAGS HOSTCFLAGS HOSTLDFLAGS UML_OBJCOPYFLAGS
endif
endif

-CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_32
-AFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_32
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_32
+KBUILD_AFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_32
CONFIG_X86_32 := y
export CONFIG_X86_32

2007-11-06 16:06:28

by Sam Ravnborg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: UML defconfig building failed again

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:11:43PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:46:02PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Jeff!
> >
> > I used today's linus-tree and defconfig to compile uml, but it failed. Error messages are
> > things like:
> >
> > In file included from include/asm/processor-generic.h:13,
> > from include/asm/processor.h:77,
> > from include/asm/thread_info.h:11,
> > from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
> > from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
> > from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
> > from include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
> > from include/linux/time.h:8,
> > from include/linux/timex.h:57,
> > from include/linux/sched.h:53,
> > from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
> > from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> > include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: ???struct user_fxsr_struct??? declared inside parameter list
> > include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> > include/asm/ptrace.h:52: warning: ???struct user_fxsr_struct??? declared inside parameter list
> > In file included from include/linux/timer.h:5,
> > from include/linux/sched.h:87,
> > from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
> > from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> > include/linux/ktime.h: In function ???ktime_set???:
> > include/linux/ktime.h:84: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
> >
> > {snip}
> >
> > It seems like CONFIG_X86_32 was not set. Any ideas?
>
> Sigh... Kbuild breakage this time... See if %s/\<[AC]FLAGS\>/KBUILD_&/g
> in arch/um/Makefile-i386 helps.
Ups - my bad.
I have somehow overlooked those two assignments in the middle.

Sam