2007-12-11 04:33:29

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] pcmcia/3c574_cs: Fix dubious bitfield warning

Fixing:
CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:194:13: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:196:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
---
Is there a reason for not doing it this way?


diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
index ad134a6..97b6daa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
@@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ enum Window3 { /* Window 3: MAC/config bits. */
union wn3_config {
int i;
struct w3_config_fields {
- unsigned int ram_size:3, ram_width:1, ram_speed:2, rom_size:2;
- int pad8:8;
- unsigned int ram_split:2, pad18:2, xcvr:3, pad21:1, autoselect:1;
- int pad24:7;
+ u8 ram_size:3, ram_width:1, ram_speed:2, rom_size:2;
+ u8 pad8;
+ u8 ram_split:2, pad18:2, xcvr:3, pad21:1;
+ u8 autoselect:1, pad24:7;
} u;
};


2007-12-11 04:33:11

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] pcmcia/3c574_cs: Fix 'shadow variable' warning

Fixing:
CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:695:7: warning: symbol 'i' shadows an earlier one
drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:636:6: originally declared here

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutson <[email protected]>
---


diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
index ad134a6..97b6daa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void tc574_reset(struct net_device *dev)
mdio_write(ioaddr, lp->phys, 4, lp->advertising);
if (!auto_polarity) {
/* works for TDK 78Q2120 series MII's */
- int i = mdio_read(ioaddr, lp->phys, 16) | 0x20;
+ i = mdio_read(ioaddr, lp->phys, 16) | 0x20;
mdio_write(ioaddr, lp->phys, 16, i);
}

2007-12-11 04:33:42

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] pcmcia/axnet_cs: Make functions static

Fixing:
CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c:994:5: warning: symbol 'ax_close' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c:1017:6: warning: symbol 'ei_tx_timeout' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
---


diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
index 8d910a3..96931cc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static int ax_open(struct net_device *dev)
*
* Opposite of ax_open(). Only used when "ifconfig <devname> down" is done.
*/
-int ax_close(struct net_device *dev)
+static int ax_close(struct net_device *dev)
{
unsigned long flags;

@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ int ax_close(struct net_device *dev)
* completed (or failed) - i.e. never posted a Tx related interrupt.
*/

-void ei_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
+static void ei_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
{
long e8390_base = dev->base_addr;
struct ei_device *ei_local = (struct ei_device *) netdev_priv(dev);

2007-12-11 04:33:58

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] pcmcia/axnet_cs: Make use of 'max()' instead of handcrafted one

Use 'max(x,y)' instead of 'x < y ? y : x'.

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
---


diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
index 8d910a3..96931cc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/axnet_cs.c
@@ -1091,8 +1091,8 @@ static int ei_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)

ei_local->irqlock = 1;

- send_length = ETH_ZLEN < length ? length : ETH_ZLEN;
-
+ send_length = max(length, ETH_ZLEN);
+
/*
* We have two Tx slots available for use. Find the first free
* slot, and then perform some sanity checks. With two Tx bufs,

2007-12-11 04:34:20

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs: Fix 'shadow variable' warning

Fixing:
CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c
drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c:1205:6: warning: symbol 'i' shadows an earlier one
drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c:1179:9: originally declared here

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
---


diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c
index 8c719b4..4f604ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c
@@ -1202,8 +1202,7 @@ static void set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
outb(1, ioaddr + RX_MODE); /* Ignore almost all multicasts. */
} else {
struct dev_mc_list *mclist;
- int i;
-
+
memset(mc_filter, 0, sizeof(mc_filter));
for (i = 0, mclist = dev->mc_list; mclist && i < dev->mc_count;
i++, mclist = mclist->next) {

2007-12-11 04:34:35

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] pcmcia/pcnet_cs: Fix 'shadow variable' warning

Fixing:
CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c
drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c:523:15: warning: symbol 'hw_info' shadows an earlier one
drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c:148:18: originally declared here

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
---


diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c
index db6a97d..5779344 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.c
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static int pcnet_config(struct pcmcia_device *link)
int i, last_ret, last_fn, start_pg, stop_pg, cm_offset;
int has_shmem = 0;
u_short buf[64];
- hw_info_t *hw_info;
+ hw_info_t *local_hw_info;
DECLARE_MAC_BUF(mac);

DEBUG(0, "pcnet_config(0x%p)\n", link);
@@ -589,23 +589,23 @@ static int pcnet_config(struct pcmcia_device *link)
dev->if_port = 0;
}

- hw_info = get_hwinfo(link);
- if (hw_info == NULL)
- hw_info = get_prom(link);
- if (hw_info == NULL)
- hw_info = get_dl10019(link);
- if (hw_info == NULL)
- hw_info = get_ax88190(link);
- if (hw_info == NULL)
- hw_info = get_hwired(link);
-
- if (hw_info == NULL) {
+ local_hw_info = get_hwinfo(link);
+ if (local_hw_info == NULL)
+ local_hw_info = get_prom(link);
+ if (local_hw_info == NULL)
+ local_hw_info = get_dl10019(link);
+ if (local_hw_info == NULL)
+ local_hw_info = get_ax88190(link);
+ if (local_hw_info == NULL)
+ local_hw_info = get_hwired(link);
+
+ if (local_hw_info == NULL) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "pcnet_cs: unable to read hardware net"
" address for io base %#3lx\n", dev->base_addr);
goto failed;
}

- info->flags = hw_info->flags;
+ info->flags = local_hw_info->flags;
/* Check for user overrides */
info->flags |= (delay_output) ? DELAY_OUTPUT : 0;
if ((link->manf_id == MANFID_SOCKET) &&

2007-12-11 13:25:40

by Alan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] pcmcia/3c574_cs: Fix dubious bitfield warning

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:32:38 +0100 (MET)
Richard Knutsson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fixing:
> CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
> drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:194:13: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
> drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:196:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
> ---
> Is there a reason for not doing it this way?

How is the endianness handled here (I suspect its always been broken)

> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
> index ad134a6..97b6daa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
> @@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ enum Window3 { /* Window 3: MAC/config bits. */
> union wn3_config {
> int i;
> struct w3_config_fields {
> - unsigned int ram_size:3, ram_width:1, ram_speed:2, rom_size:2;
> - int pad8:8;
> - unsigned int ram_split:2, pad18:2, xcvr:3, pad21:1, autoselect:1;
> - int pad24:7;
> + u8 ram_size:3, ram_width:1, ram_speed:2, rom_size:2;
> + u8 pad8;
> + u8 ram_split:2, pad18:2, xcvr:3, pad21:1;
> + u8 autoselect:1, pad24:7;

Just changing the int pad to unsigned int pad would be safer in terms of
not causing changes. Simply delcaring a 32bit field and bit masks to
and/or into it is probably a lot saner in the general case.

2007-12-11 13:28:18

by Alan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pcmcia/3c574_cs: Fix 'shadow variable' warning

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:32:43 +0100 (MET)
Richard Knutsson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fixing:
> CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
> drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:695:7: warning: symbol 'i' shadows an earlier one
> drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:636:6: originally declared here
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutson <[email protected]>

For 2/3/4/5/6:

Acked-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

Not sure I agree with the first patch though.

2007-12-12 01:40:06

by Richard Knutsson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] pcmcia/3c574_cs: Fix dubious bitfield warning

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:32:38 +0100 (MET)
> Richard Knutsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> Fixing:
>> CHECK drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
>> drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:194:13: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
>> drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c:196:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Is there a reason for not doing it this way?
>>
>
> How is the endianness handled here (I suspect its always been broken)
>
Guess so, but it should not handle the endians differently with such a
change, does it?
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
>> index ad134a6..97b6daa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
>> @@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ enum Window3 { /* Window 3: MAC/config bits. */
>> union wn3_config {
>> int i;
>> struct w3_config_fields {
>> - unsigned int ram_size:3, ram_width:1, ram_speed:2, rom_size:2;
>> - int pad8:8;
>> - unsigned int ram_split:2, pad18:2, xcvr:3, pad21:1, autoselect:1;
>> - int pad24:7;
>> + u8 ram_size:3, ram_width:1, ram_speed:2, rom_size:2;
>> + u8 pad8;
>> + u8 ram_split:2, pad18:2, xcvr:3, pad21:1;
>> + u8 autoselect:1, pad24:7;
>>
>
> Just changing the int pad to unsigned int pad would be safer in terms of
> not causing changes. Simply delcaring a 32bit field and bit masks to
> and/or into it is probably a lot saner in the general case.
>
Thought about it before and with the endian-issue it seem like a better
solution.
So, something like this?


Attachments:
drivers_net_pcmcia_3c574_cs.c-dubious-bitfield.patch (1.04 kB)