Just for a heads up, for about the last 8 hours, verizon, my ISP, has been inserting themselves into the path between my gmail account and my local fetchmail of this email subcription at pop.gmail.com.
Worse yet they are bouncing the messages in a way that makes it look as if I
sent them when they in fact originated at vger.kernel.org. Somehow they have
convinced themselves that any mailing list this busy must be spam and is to be
bounced. Either that or they, verizon, since they sleep with M$, have taken a
large under the table payment to screw with linux in any way they can. It
bears investigating.
I called just now and screamed bloody murder at tech support, and in about 15
minutes I started getting the list again, BUT they are still in the path
between vger and my fetchmail daemon as shown below.
Or at least that is how I am interpreting the incoming headers, which now look
like this by the time they hit my inbox but with my SA headers clipped:
-----------------------
Received: from incoming.verizon.net [206.46.232.10]
by coyote.coyote.den with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6)
for <gene@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:10:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailbag1.bizmailsrvcs.net ([172.18.12.131])
by vms051.mailsrvcs.net
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006))
with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
[email protected]; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:08:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [64.233.162.238] (port=3333 helo=nz-out-0506.google.com)
by mailbag1.bizmailsrvcs.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1J5XG9-00052G-Du for [email protected]; Thu,
20 Dec 2007 20:05:09 -0600
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so90741nzc.3 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr436687wfd.221.1198202887677; Thu,
20 Dec 2007 18:08:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.222.3 with SMTP id u3cs177296wfg; Thu,
20 Dec 2007 18:08:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.202.9 with SMTP id z9mr1420295anf.42.1198202883749; Thu,
20 Dec 2007 18:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.176.167])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q26si917844ele.6.2007.12.20.18.07.38; Thu,
20 Dec 2007 18:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: ([email protected]) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id
S1759056AbXLUCHP (ORCPT <rfc822;[email protected]> + 49 others); Thu,
20 Dec 2007 21:07:15 -0500
Received: ([email protected]) by vger.kernel.org id S1754373AbXLUB7V
(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:59:21 -0500
Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca
([132.207.4.11]:53375 "EHLO smtp.polymtl.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761264AbXLUB7M
(ORCPT <rfc822;[email protected]>); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:59:12 -0500
Received: from dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca
(dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca [132.207.72.10]) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8)
with ESMTP id lBL1vVHB024689
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu,
20 Dec 2007 20:57:32 -0500
Received: from compudj by dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca with local (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1J5X8g-00040X-Gt; Thu,
20 Dec 2007 20:57:26 -0500
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:54:50 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Subject: [patch 12/24] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code
X-Originating-IP: [172.18.12.131]
Sender: [email protected]
To: [email protected],
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>,
Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Message-id: <[email protected]>
X-Forwarded-for: [email protected] [email protected]
Content-disposition: inline;
filename=immediate-values-architecture-independent-code.patch
Precedence: bulk
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
[email protected] designates 209.132.176.167 as permitted
sender) client-ip=209.132.176.167;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record
for domain of [email protected] designates 209.132.176.167 as
permitted sender) [email protected]
X-Forwarded-To: [email protected]
X-Poly-FromMTA: (dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca [132.207.72.10]) at Fri,
21 Dec 2007 01:57:31 +0000
References: <[email protected]>
X-Mailing-List: [email protected]
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1
X-procmail: user=gene
Status: RO
X-Status: UC
X-KMail-EncryptionState:
X-KMail-SignatureState:
X-KMail-MDN-Sent:
Any mail experts here want to debunk my findings, jump right in, I'm not an
email guru, but it sure looks to me as if they are rerouting ANY port 25
access through their servers now. And M$ would pay millions to screw us,
and has, its a matter of record.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Lo! Men have become the tool of their tools.
-- Henry David Thoreau
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:10:39PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:10:39 -0500
> From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
> Subject: Morer verizon problems
> To: [email protected]
>
> Just for a heads up, for about the last 8 hours, verizon, my ISP, has been
> inserting themselves into the path between my gmail account and my local
> fetchmail of this email subcription at pop.gmail.com.
Gene,
The Received: header data are telling something else.
You read them from bottom-most up -- new one is always inserted on top of
the existing headers.
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so90741nzc.3 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
It does look like you have a forwarding setting at gmail to your
verizononline.net service. If you had chosen to pull email out of
gmail, then perhaps you would not have had any verizon problems.
While conspiracy mongering has its fun, I do think that you are in fact
causing this all to yourself by trying to push the message flood to
Verizon.. For what it matters - LKML has 3 subscribers on @verizon.net
addresses.
I do run my own mail-server, and my Linux mailboxes are at present over
1 GB/y. Gmail mailbox would be a bit larger - underlying database
granularity is around 128 or 256 kB, as I recall having read about
google technology.
> Worse yet they are bouncing the messages in a way that makes it look as if I
> sent them when they in fact originated at vger.kernel.org. Somehow they have
> convinced themselves that any mailing list this busy must be spam and is to be
> bounced. Either that or they, verizon, since they sleep with M$, have taken a
> large under the table payment to screw with linux in any way they can. It
> bears investigating.
>
> I called just now and screamed bloody murder at tech support, and in about 15
> minutes I started getting the list again, BUT they are still in the path
> between vger and my fetchmail daemon as shown below.
Yes, I would fetch directly from gmail, if I were you...
/Matti Aarnio -- one of <postmaster at vger.kernel.org>
> Or at least that is how I am interpreting the incoming headers, which now look
> like this by the time they hit my inbox but with my SA headers clipped:
> -----------------------
> Received: from incoming.verizon.net [206.46.232.10]
> by coyote.coyote.den with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6)
> for <gene@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:10:08 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from mailbag1.bizmailsrvcs.net ([172.18.12.131])
> by vms051.mailsrvcs.net
> (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006))
> with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
> [email protected]; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:08:11 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from [64.233.162.238] (port=3333 helo=nz-out-0506.google.com)
> by mailbag1.bizmailsrvcs.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
> (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
> id 1J5XG9-00052G-Du for [email protected]; Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 20:05:09 -0600
> Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so90741nzc.3 for
> <[email protected]>; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by 10.142.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr436687wfd.221.1198202887677; Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 18:08:07 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by 10.142.222.3 with SMTP id u3cs177296wfg; Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 18:08:07 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by 10.100.202.9 with SMTP id z9mr1420295anf.42.1198202883749; Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 18:08:03 -0800 (PST)
> Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.176.167])
> by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q26si917844ele.6.2007.12.20.18.07.38; Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 18:08:03 -0800 (PST)
> Received: ([email protected]) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id
> S1759056AbXLUCHP (ORCPT <rfc822;[email protected]> + 49 others); Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 21:07:15 -0500
> Received: ([email protected]) by vger.kernel.org id S1754373AbXLUB7V
> (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:59:21 -0500
> Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca
> ([132.207.4.11]:53375 "EHLO smtp.polymtl.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
> by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761264AbXLUB7M
> (ORCPT <rfc822;[email protected]>); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:59:12 -0500
> Received: from dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca
> (dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca [132.207.72.10]) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8)
> with ESMTP id lBL1vVHB024689
> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 20:57:32 -0500
> Received: from compudj by dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca with local (Exim 4.63)
> (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1J5X8g-00040X-Gt; Thu,
> 20 Dec 2007 20:57:26 -0500
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:54:50 -0500
> From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> Subject: [patch 12/24] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code
> X-Originating-IP: [172.18.12.131]
> Sender: [email protected]
> To: [email protected],
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>,
> Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
> Message-id: <[email protected]>
> X-Forwarded-for: [email protected] [email protected]
> Content-disposition: inline;
> filename=immediate-values-architecture-independent-code.patch
> Precedence: bulk
> Delivered-to: [email protected]
> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
> [email protected] designates 209.132.176.167 as permitted
> sender) client-ip=209.132.176.167;
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record
> for domain of [email protected] designates 209.132.176.167 as
> permitted sender) [email protected]
> X-Forwarded-To: [email protected]
> X-Poly-FromMTA: (dijkstra.casi.polymtl.ca [132.207.72.10]) at Fri,
> 21 Dec 2007 01:57:31 +0000
> References: <[email protected]>
> X-Mailing-List: [email protected]
> List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1
> X-procmail: user=gene
> Status: RO
> X-Status: UC
> X-KMail-EncryptionState:
> X-KMail-SignatureState:
> X-KMail-MDN-Sent:
>
> Any mail experts here want to debunk my findings, jump right in, I'm not an
> email guru, but it sure looks to me as if they are rerouting ANY port 25
> access through their servers now. And M$ would pay millions to screw us,
> and has, its a matter of record.
>
> --
> Cheers, Gene
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Lo! Men have become the tool of their tools.
> -- Henry David Thoreau
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/