[This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to calm down
a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
Now, following an Ingo's advice, the list has been generated directly out of
the Bugzilla entries used for tracking the bugs. I'm going to release the
script used for generating the list, so that it can be recreated by anyone on
the fly.]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24 reported since
2.6.25-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
of. ?If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. ?Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-02-17 61 45 37
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9833
Subject : VIDEO_DEV=y/m, I2C=n compile error
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-01-27 13:11
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/27/175
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 94 events on macbooks REGRESSION
Submitter : Emil Karlson <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-01-29 08:15
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
Subject : Undocking Lenovo ThinkPad T61 causes oops
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-02 02:07
Handled-By : Len Brown <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9938
Subject : building fails on lguest
Submitter : Cedric OLLIVIER <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-11 15:34
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9948
Subject : [BUG] 2.6.25-rc1-git1 softlockup while bootup on powerpc
Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-12 08:09
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/44
Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Subject : ipw3945: not only it periodically dies, it also BUG()s
Submitter : Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-05 22:44
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/5/453
Handled-By : Chatre, Reinette <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9958
Subject : parisc compile error
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-08 01:12
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/7/572
Handled-By : Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
Subject : mount: could not find filesystem
Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-12 14:34
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/91
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Subject : kernel BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:464!
Submitter : Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-08 20:03
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/331
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9973
Subject : My mm-mystery-crash has now sneaked into mainline
Submitter : Torsten Kaiser <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-11 22:46
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/424
Handled-By : Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978
Subject : 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-13 10:30
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/128
Handled-By : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9980
Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 on Sun Ultra 40
Submitter : Jasper Bryant-Greene <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-13 12:25
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/181
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9982
Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 panics on boot
Submitter : Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-13 18:03
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/363
Handled-By : Chris Snook <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9983
Subject : PROBLEM: 2.6.25-rc1-git2 freezes when accessing external USB hard disk (ehci-hcd)
Submitter : Linas ?virblis <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-13 22:38
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/566
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984
Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git
Submitter : Mariusz Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-13 23:16
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/587
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9992
Subject : 2.6.24-git: kmap_atomic() WARN_ON()
Submitter : Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-07 00:58
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/6/451
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 regression - IBM ACPI backlight controlls do not work
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-15 04:51
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10002
Subject : wpa_supplicant doens't work and froze the computer
Submitter : Fran?ois Valenduc <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 08:25
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10003
Subject : hda_intel: balance control does not work correctly
Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 09:58
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
Subject : The computer is blocked when X is started
Submitter : Fran?ois Valenduc <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 06:28
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10012
Subject : 2.6.24-git4+ regression
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-01-30 14:56
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/254
Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10013
Subject : tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-15 02:52
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/546
Handled-By : Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10014
Subject : commit 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034 is broken
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 03:08
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/542
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10015
Subject : [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Kernel Ooops while running dbench
Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 06:44
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10016
Subject : cobalt_btns.c <-> struct platform_device compile error
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 12:12
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/293
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10017
Subject : cdev removal broke cobalt_btns.c compilation
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 12:14
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/295
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10019
Subject : mips/bcm47xx/setup.c compile error
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 12:19
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/297
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10020
Subject : mips SMBUS_PSC_BASE compile errors
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 12:21
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/299
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10021
Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc2 regression: LVM cannot find volume group
Submitter : Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 20:14
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/208
Handled-By : Alan Cox <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10022
Subject : [2.6.25-rc1] jerky mouse cursor and randoooom key repeats
Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-13 09:41
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/82
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
Subject : 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 13:06
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/82
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10025
Subject : Current git very broken on the Dreamcast
Submitter : Adrian McMenamin <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 19:38
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/196
Handled-By : Kristoffer Ericson <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10026
Subject : 2.6.25-rc1/2 CD/DVD burning broken
Submitter : Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 21:52
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/262
Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10027
Subject : 2.6.25-rc[12] Video4Linux Bttv Regression
Submitter : Bongani Hlope <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 09:36
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/55
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10029
Subject : [2.6.25-rc2] System freezes ca. 1 minute after logging into KDE
Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 11:39
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/78
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10030
Subject : Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 12:00
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/81
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10031
Subject : [2.6.25-rc2] e100: Trying to free already-free IRQ 11 during suspend ...
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 13:36
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/125
Regressionn with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9947
Subject : [ata crash] Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc1
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-12 09:18
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/67
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/111
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9951
Subject : [2.6.25-rc1] Strange regression with CONFIG_HZ_300=y
Submitter : Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-11 14:41
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/161
Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/351
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
Subject : [2.6.25-rc0 System no longer powers off after shutdown
Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-11 16:23
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/198
Handled-By : Greg KH <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/342
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
Subject : 2.6.24-git15 Keyboard Issue?
Submitter : Chris Holvenstot <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-06 14:02
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/6/100
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9976
Subject : BUG: 2.6.25-rc1: iptables postrouting setup causes oops
Submitter : Ben Nizette <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-12 12:46
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/148
Handled-By : Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/177
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
Subject : [build bug] sound/drivers/opl3/opl3_synth.c
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-01 11:17
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/1/140
Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/1/152
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10018
Subject : CRYPTO_NULL must select CRYPTO_BLKCIPHER
Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-17 12:17
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/296
Handled-By : Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/296
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10023
Subject : 2.6.25-rc2 vdso_install breaks user "make install"
Submitter : Rene Herman <[email protected]>
Date : 2008-02-16 04:31
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/555
Handled-By : Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/73
For details, please follow the links given in references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.24,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9832
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
> Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 94 events on macbooks REGRESSION
> Submitter : Emil Karlson <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-01-29 08:15
I have already fixed this one, and fix has been already picked by Linus
from my tree, so you can drop this one. (even the bugzilla is closed
properly).
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984
> Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git
The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :)
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10002
> Subject : wpa_supplicant doens't work and froze the computer
> Submitter : Fran?ois Valenduc <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-16 08:25
[ ... ]
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10014
> Subject : commit 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034 is broken
> Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-16 03:08
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/542
These two are the same bug. I think we really need 45b503548 reverted in
mainline.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10022
> Subject : [2.6.25-rc1] jerky mouse cursor and randoooom key repeats
> Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-13 09:41
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/82
> Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Looks like this is issue with CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED. Waiting for Peter's
feedback.
BTW it would be nice to receive CC in the bugzilla, when I have Handled-by
on that bug :) (but hey, I know that it is difficult to track all the
persons addressess, when they are not using them consistently).
> Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
> the list in there.
Thanks a lot Rafael for this regression tracking.
BTW I think it might still be useful to CC everyone involved on these
reports, even though the bugzillas probably have the correct addressess
already.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Hello,
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984
> > Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git
>
> The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :)
That's a typo :/ Should read 2.6.25-rc1 instead.
Mariusz
On Sunday, 17 of February 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
> > Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 94 events on macbooks REGRESSION
> > Submitter : Emil Karlson <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-01-29 08:15
>
> I have already fixed this one, and fix has been already picked by Linus
> from my tree, so you can drop this one. (even the bugzilla is closed
> properly).
Hmm, the script should have noticed that. I'll need to figure out why it didn't.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984
> > Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git
>
> The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :)
Well, this is the original message's subject. :-)
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10002
> > Subject : wpa_supplicant doens't work and froze the computer
> > Submitter : Fran?ois Valenduc <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-02-16 08:25
> [ ... ]
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10014
> > Subject : commit 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034 is broken
> > Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-02-16 03:08
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/542
>
> These two are the same bug.
Ah, okay. I'll mark one of them as a duplicate.
> I think we really need 45b503548 reverted in mainline.
Definitely.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10022
> > Subject : [2.6.25-rc1] jerky mouse cursor and randoooom key repeats
> > Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-02-13 09:41
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/82
> > Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
>
> Looks like this is issue with CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED. Waiting for Peter's
> feedback.
>
> BTW it would be nice to receive CC in the bugzilla, when I have Handled-by
> on that bug :) (but hey, I know that it is difficult to track all the
> persons addressess, when they are not using them consistently).
In fact, some people don't like to get messages from the Bugzilla and asked me
directly not to put them in the CC lists in there, so I'm a bit cautious ...
> > Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
> > the list in there.
>
> Thanks a lot Rafael for this regression tracking.
>
> BTW I think it might still be useful to CC everyone involved on these
> reports, even though the bugzillas probably have the correct addressess
> already.
Hm, I'd rather avoid sending messages with 100+ addresses in the CC list. :-)
Perhaps I can write a script to send followup messages to everyone involved
for each of the regressions listed, but that will take time (or perhaps someone
could do that for me ;-)).
Thanks,
Rafael
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:06:41AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 of February 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
> > > Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 94 events on macbooks REGRESSION
> > > Submitter : Emil Karlson <[email protected]>
> > > Date : 2008-01-29 08:15
> >
> > I have already fixed this one, and fix has been already picked by Linus
> > from my tree, so you can drop this one. (even the bugzilla is closed
> > properly).
>
> Hmm, the script should have noticed that. I'll need to figure out why it didn't.
It was marked as resolved, not as closed.
>...
> > > Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
> > > the list in there.
> >
> > Thanks a lot Rafael for this regression tracking.
> >
> > BTW I think it might still be useful to CC everyone involved on these
> > reports, even though the bugzillas probably have the correct addressess
> > already.
>
> Hm, I'd rather avoid sending messages with 100+ addresses in the CC list. :-)
>...
The main problem is vger dropping emails with >= 30 recipients...
> Thanks,
> Rafael
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10002
> Subject : wpa_supplicant doens't work and froze the computer
> Submitter : Fran?ois Valenduc <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-16 08:25
>
[...]
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10014
> Subject : commit 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034 is broken
> Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-16 03:08
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/542
>
Are not they actually the same?
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> [This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to
> calm down a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
>
> Now, following an Ingo's advice, the list has been generated directly
> out of the Bugzilla entries used for tracking the bugs. I'm going to
> release the script used for generating the list, so that it can be
> recreated by anyone on the fly.]
>
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24 reported
> since 2.6.25-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please
> let me know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please
> let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let
> me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
question: can we please list the last known good version for each entry?
Since these are all regressions (right?) that information ought to be available
and usually helps down in narrowing causes..
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [email protected]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
> Subject : [2.6.25-rc0 System no longer powers off after shutdown
> Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-11 16:23
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/198
> Handled-By : Greg KH <[email protected]>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/342
This bug is happening here too. I didn?t apply the patch yet (I?ll do it
when I get home), but if cpufreq is disabled, the system powers off
normally.
I?m using Linus? git tree, commit 1309d4e68497184d2fd87e892ddf14076c2bda98.
Cheers,
Carlos
--
Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio
[email protected]
http://nerdfeliz.com/
On 02/17/2008 11:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10021
> Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc2 regression: LVM cannot find volume group
> Submitter : Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-16 20:14
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/208
> Handled-By : Alan Cox <[email protected]>
NOTABUG, http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/386
On 2/18/08, Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/17/2008 11:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10021
> > Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc2 regression: LVM cannot find volume group
> > Submitter : Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-02-16 20:14
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/208
> > Handled-By : Alan Cox <[email protected]>
>
> NOTABUG, http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/17/386
Wow! Please delete CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED and make it always Y, then.
1. Box is running fine.
2. Kernel upgrade -- sysfs layout changes -- box breaks.
3. sysfs people tell everyone to upgrade userspace or turn on shiny new option
4. Some believe this, upgrades userspace. Option is not needed now,
BTW. It's turned off.
5. Several more kernel upgrades were fine.
6. 2.6.25-rc1 comes out and, who would have thought, requires to turn
on that damn
option again or else box simply doesn't boot.
Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
* Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
seconded ...
it's insane how inconvenient certain storage systems are to use, and
people get turned away with NOATBUG. ITISABUG every time user-space
breaks or the user has to do _anything_ to get the box working as it
should.
Ingo
On 02/18/2008 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
>> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
>
> seconded ...
>
> it's insane how inconvenient certain storage systems are to use, and
> people get turned away with NOATBUG. ITISABUG every time user-space
> breaks or the user has to do _anything_ to get the box working as it
> should.
No, user needn't to do anything. Just turn that default y option really to y
(yes, you are right, the help text of this option is misleading...). It's like
you turn off old acpi events option and scream that you acpi daemon doesn't work
for instance. There are many instances of this behaviour in the kernel. And yes,
many people don't need that option tuyrned on -- I think we need not-y testers
too, but it might be my personal feeling.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9982
> Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 panics on boot
> Submitter : Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-02-13 18:03
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/363
> Handled-By : Chris Snook <[email protected]>
Hi Rafael,
A fix was proposed and accepted at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14832&action=view .
The bug has been marked as resolved. (You might want to modify your
script to handle such cases.)
--
regards,
Dhaval
On 2/18/08, Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/18/2008 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
> >> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
> >
> > seconded ...
> >
> > it's insane how inconvenient certain storage systems are to use, and
> > people get turned away with NOATBUG. ITISABUG every time user-space
> > breaks or the user has to do _anything_ to get the box working as it
> > should.
>
> No, user needn't to do anything. Just turn that default y option really to y
Suprise, surprise, make oldconfig won't tell you anything about defaults
because you already turned it off moons ago.
> (yes, you are right, the help text of this option is misleading...).
Agree, reference to 2006 is particularly pathetic, given that breakage
happened on recent fedora (sorry, box was reinstalled since then,
I can't recall which fedora exactly).
> It's like you turn off old acpi events option and scream that you acpi daemon
> doesn't work for instance.
> There are many instances of this behaviour in the kernel.
Indeed, but don't mix types of breakage, please.
You can turn off ACPI or CPU_FREQ or SMP and forget.
You can't turn off SYSFS_DEPRECATED and forget.
> And yes, many people don't need that option tuyrned on --
Wish them luck.
/me goes on thinking about cpufreqfs to eventually turn off SYSFS
completely.
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > [This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to
> > calm down a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
> >
> > Now, following an Ingo's advice, the list has been generated directly
> > out of the Bugzilla entries used for tracking the bugs. I'm going to
> > release the script used for generating the list, so that it can be
> > recreated by anyone on the fly.]
> >
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24 reported
> > since 2.6.25-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the
> > mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please
> > let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let
> > me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
>
>
> question: can we please list the last known good version for each entry?
> Since these are all regressions (right?) that information ought to be available
> and usually helps down in narrowing causes..
Well, this usually is only obvious for the cases in which the "guilty" commit
has been identified and that information is already provided in the Bugzilla
entries.
I can add a "Caused-By" tag so that it gets listed, if that helps.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
> > Subject : [2.6.25-rc0 System no longer powers off after shutdown
> > Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-02-11 16:23
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/198
> > Handled-By : Greg KH <[email protected]>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/342
>
> This bug is happening here too. I didn?t apply the patch yet (I?ll do it
> when I get home), but if cpufreq is disabled, the system powers off
> normally.
>
> I?m using Linus? git tree, commit 1309d4e68497184d2fd87e892ddf14076c2bda98.
Have you tried to apply the patch listed?
Rafael
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/18/2008 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
> >> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
> >
> > seconded ...
> >
> > it's insane how inconvenient certain storage systems are to use, and
> > people get turned away with NOATBUG. ITISABUG every time user-space
> > breaks or the user has to do _anything_ to get the box working as it
> > should.
>
> No, user needn't to do anything. Just turn that default y option really to y
> (yes, you are right, the help text of this option is misleading...). It's like
> you turn off old acpi events option and scream that you acpi daemon doesn't work
> for instance. There are many instances of this behaviour in the kernel. And yes,
> many people don't need that option tuyrned on -- I think we need not-y testers
> too, but it might be my personal feeling.
Well, my definition of a regression from 2.6.24 is that it happens when someone
takes a .config that worked with 2.6.24, configures the kernel with that,
leaving the defaults for the options he is _asked_ _for_, and the resulting
kernel doesn't work as expected.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9982
> > Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 panics on boot
> > Submitter : Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2008-02-13 18:03
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/363
> > Handled-By : Chris Snook <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> A fix was proposed and accepted at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14832&action=view .
>
> The bug has been marked as resolved. (You might want to modify your
> script to handle such cases.)
The rule is that the regressions are listed as long as they are not fixed _in_
_the_ _mainline_ (or not rejected, in some rare cases), in which cases the
Bugzilla entries should be explicitly marked as "closed".
Thanks,
Rafael
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:27:27 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
> > > Subject : [2.6.25-rc0 System no longer powers off after shutdown
> > > Submitter : Frans Pop <[email protected]>
> > > Date : 2008-02-11 16:23
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/198
> > > Handled-By : Greg KH <[email protected]>
> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/342
> >
> > This bug is happening here too. I didn?t apply the patch yet (I?ll do it
> > when I get home), but if cpufreq is disabled, the system powers off
> > normally.
> >
> > I?m using Linus? git tree, commit 1309d4e68497184d2fd87e892ddf14076c2bda98.
>
> Have you tried to apply the patch listed?
Yes, just tried. It works fine with SMP both enabled or disabled. I?m not
sure if removing that piece of code is the right thing to do though.
Cheers,
Carlos
--
Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio
[email protected]
http://nerdfeliz.com/
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, my definition of a regression from 2.6.24 is that it happens
> when someone takes a .config that worked with 2.6.24, configures the
> kernel with that, leaving the defaults for the options he is _asked_
> _for_, and the resulting kernel doesn't work as expected.
yep, and that's how users determine whether "the new kernel works", so
it's what we follow as well.
Ingo
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:24:53 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > question: can we please list the last known good version for each
> > entry? Since these are all regressions (right?) that information
> > ought to be available and usually helps down in narrowing causes..
>
> Well, this usually is only obvious for the cases in which the
last-known-good SHOULD be obvious. These are regressions right?
A regression means "version X worked, version Y does not".
If there is no version X, it's not a regression.
Knowing version X is helpful to know how far back to look.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [email protected]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org