just curious about this:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/pre-releases
given that it seems filled with really old 2.6.0 content, what's the
value in it? just curious.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> just curious about this:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/pre-releases
These were the -test kernels that preceeded 2.6.0.
> given that it seems filled with really old 2.6.0 content, what's the
> value in it? just curious.
just curious about this:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic
given that it seems filled with really old content, what's the
value in it? just curious.
;-)
> rday
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > just curious about this:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/pre-releases
>
> These were the -test kernels that preceeded 2.6.0.
>
> > given that it seems filled with really old 2.6.0 content, what's the
> > value in it? just curious.
>
> just curious about this:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic
>
> given that it seems filled with really old content, what's the
> value in it? just curious.
>
> ;-)
um ... i'm going to assume you were being facetious since i can
certainly see the value in the very, very first "official" release of
linux, while still not seeing the point in a directory labelled
"pre-releases" which contains nothing but pre-2.6.0 patches that go
back to 2003. on the other hand, that *would* make sense under the
Historic directory.
rday
p.s. and while i'm whining, would it be possible to clear the
obsolete "LATEST-IS" files out of:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing
i have a script that grabs the latest rc tarball out of that
directory, and it got confused by seeing more than one LATEST-IS file.
not hard to work around but, still ...
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:41:36PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > just curious about this:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/pre-releases
> >
> > These were the -test kernels that preceeded 2.6.0.
> >
> > > given that it seems filled with really old 2.6.0 content, what's the
> > > value in it? just curious.
> >
> > just curious about this:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic
> >
> > given that it seems filled with really old content, what's the
> > value in it? just curious.
> >
> > ;-)
>
> um ... i'm going to assume you were being facetious since i can
> certainly see the value in the very, very first "official" release of
> linux, while still not seeing the point in a directory labelled
> "pre-releases" which contains nothing but pre-2.6.0 patches that go
> back to 2003. on the other hand, that *would* make sense under the
> Historic directory.
We even have
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/old-test-kernels/
The directory you spotted contains the pre-releases of 2.6 .
When is something historic and when might people search for it at the
old place?
But considering that one dir doesn't harm much I don't think there's
much point discussing it further.
> rday
>
> p.s. and while i'm whining, would it be possible to clear the
> obsolete "LATEST-IS" files out of:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing
>
> i have a script that grabs the latest rc tarball out of that
> directory, and it got confused by seeing more than one LATEST-IS file.
> not hard to work around but, still ...
For this you have to whine to the guy who places them there:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 torvalds kernel 0 Mar 5 04:44 LATEST-IS-2.6.25-rc4
-rw-rw-r-- 1 torvalds kernel 0 Mar 10 05:30 LATEST-IS-2.6.25-rc5
-rw-rw-r-- 1 torvalds kernel 0 Mar 16 23:50 LATEST-IS-2.6.25-rc6
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:41:36PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > p.s. and while i'm whining, would it be possible to clear the
> > obsolete "LATEST-IS" files out of:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing
> >
> > i have a script that grabs the latest rc tarball out of that
> > directory, and it got confused by seeing more than one LATEST-IS file.
> > not hard to work around but, still ...
>
> For this you have to whine to the guy who places them there:
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 torvalds kernel 0 Mar 5 04:44 LATEST-IS-2.6.25-rc4
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 torvalds kernel 0 Mar 10 05:30 LATEST-IS-2.6.25-rc5
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 torvalds kernel 0 Mar 16 23:50 LATEST-IS-2.6.25-rc6
darned newbies. :-P
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
On Mar 21 2008 13:41, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> p.s. and while i'm whining, would it be possible to clear the
> obsolete "LATEST-IS" files out of:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing
>
> i have a script that grabs the latest rc tarball out of that
> directory, and it got confused by seeing more than one LATEST-IS file.
> not hard to work around but, still ...
In that case, why not directly parse the directory and
do away with LATEST-IS-* ...