In 2.6.25, 'find /proc/ -name foo' will print out ..
find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
should have been searched.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:34:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> In 2.6.25, 'find /proc/ -name foo' will print out ..
>
> find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
> in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
> option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
> should have been searched.
I also encountered this one. I think it is the one which 2.6.25.6 stable
patch 42/50 fixes.
Willy
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:46:04PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:34:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > In 2.6.25, 'find /proc/ -name foo' will print out ..
> >
> > find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
> > in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
> > option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
> > should have been searched.
>
> I also encountered this one. I think it is the one which 2.6.25.6 stable
> patch 42/50 fixes.
Ah, great. I just noticed that .26rc doesn't seem affected, so sounds good.
Thanks,
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
El Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:50:42 -0400
Dave Jones <[email protected]> escribió:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:46:04PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:34:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > In 2.6.25, 'find /proc/ -name foo' will print out ..
> > >
> > > find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
> > > in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
> > > option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
> > > should have been searched.
> >
> > I also encountered this one. I think it is the one which 2.6.25.6 stable
> > patch 42/50 fixes.
>
> Ah, great. I just noticed that .26rc doesn't seem affected, so sounds good.
well on my ubuntu box i get with .26-rc5
[alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$ uname -a
Linux Varda 2.6.26-rc5 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 5 10:59:53 CEST 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$ LC_ALL=C sudo find /proc -name foo
find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been searched.
find: /proc/5257/net: Invalid argument
[alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:04:18PM +0200, Alejandro Riveira Fern?ndez wrote:
> El Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:50:42 -0400
> Dave Jones <[email protected]> escribi?:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:46:04PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:34:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > In 2.6.25, 'find /proc/ -name foo' will print out ..
> > > >
> > > > find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
> > > > in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
> > > > option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
> > > > should have been searched.
> > >
> > > I also encountered this one. I think it is the one which 2.6.25.6 stable
> > > patch 42/50 fixes.
> >
> > Ah, great. I just noticed that .26rc doesn't seem affected, so sounds good.
>
> well on my ubuntu box i get with .26-rc5
>
> [alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$ uname -a
> Linux Varda 2.6.26-rc5 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 5 10:59:53 CEST 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$ LC_ALL=C sudo find /proc -name foo
> find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been searched.
> find: /proc/5257/net: Invalid argument
> [alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$
It was merged after 2.6.26-rc5. Commit id is aed54175 which is post-rc5.
Regards,
Willy
El Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:08:18 +0200
Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> escribió:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:04:18PM +0200, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> > El Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:50:42 -0400
> > Dave Jones <[email protected]> escribió:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:46:04PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:34:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > In 2.6.25, 'find /proc/ -name foo' will print out ..
> > > > >
> > > > > find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug
> > > > > in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
> > > > > option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
> > > > > should have been searched.
> > > >
> > > > I also encountered this one. I think it is the one which 2.6.25.6 stable
> > > > patch 42/50 fixes.
> > >
> > > Ah, great. I just noticed that .26rc doesn't seem affected, so sounds good.
> >
> > well on my ubuntu box i get with .26-rc5
> >
> > [alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$ uname -a
> > Linux Varda 2.6.26-rc5 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 5 10:59:53 CEST 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > [alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$ LC_ALL=C sudo find /proc -name foo
> > find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1: this may be a bug in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been searched.
> > find: /proc/5257/net: Invalid argument
> > [alex@Varda:kernel/linux-2.6]$
>
> It was merged after 2.6.26-rc5. Commit id is aed54175 which is post-rc5.
Thank you
>
> Regards,
> Willy
Alejandro
>