2008-07-03 18:38:17

by Yinghai Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] x86: move saving e820_saved to setup_memory_map


so other path that will override memory_setup or machine_specific_memory_setup could
have e820_saved too

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -1294,8 +1294,6 @@ char *__init default_machine_specific_me
e820_add_region(HIGH_MEMORY, mem_size << 10, E820_RAM);
}

- memcpy(&e820_saved, &e820, sizeof(struct e820map));
-
/* In case someone cares... */
return who;
}
@@ -1313,8 +1311,12 @@ char * __init __attribute__((weak)) memo

void __init setup_memory_map(void)
{
+ char *who;
+
+ who = memory_setup();
+ memcpy(&e820_saved, &e820, sizeof(struct e820map));
printk(KERN_INFO "BIOS-provided physical RAM map:\n");
- e820_print_map(memory_setup());
+ e820_print_map(who);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64


2008-07-03 18:38:53

by Yinghai Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] x86: make e820_saved have update from setup_data


seperate reserve_setup_data into e820_reserved_setup_data,
and reserve_early_setup_data.

So could use e820_reserved_setup_data to backup e820 with setup_data

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -394,11 +394,10 @@ static void __init parse_setup_data(void
}
}

-static void __init reserve_setup_data(void)
+static void __init e820_reserve_setup_data(void)
{
struct setup_data *data;
u64 pa_data;
- char buf[32];
int found = 0;

if (boot_params.hdr.version < 0x0209)
@@ -406,8 +405,6 @@ static void __init reserve_setup_data(vo
pa_data = boot_params.hdr.setup_data;
while (pa_data) {
data = early_ioremap(pa_data, sizeof(*data));
- sprintf(buf, "setup data %x", data->type);
- reserve_early(pa_data, pa_data+sizeof(*data)+data->len, buf);
e820_update_range(pa_data, sizeof(*data)+data->len,
E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED_KERN);
found = 1;
@@ -418,10 +415,29 @@ static void __init reserve_setup_data(vo
return;

sanitize_e820_map(e820.map, ARRAY_SIZE(e820.map), &e820.nr_map);
+ memcpy(&e820_saved, &e820, sizeof(struct e820map));
printk(KERN_INFO "extended physical RAM map:\n");
e820_print_map("reserve setup_data");
}

+static void __init reserve_early_setup_data(void)
+{
+ struct setup_data *data;
+ u64 pa_data;
+ char buf[32];
+
+ if (boot_params.hdr.version < 0x0209)
+ return;
+ pa_data = boot_params.hdr.setup_data;
+ while (pa_data) {
+ data = early_ioremap(pa_data, sizeof(*data));
+ sprintf(buf, "setup data %x", data->type);
+ reserve_early(pa_data, pa_data+sizeof(*data)+data->len, buf);
+ pa_data = data->next;
+ early_iounmap(data, sizeof(*data));
+ }
+}
+
/*
* --------- Crashkernel reservation ------------------------------
*/
@@ -626,6 +642,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)

setup_memory_map();
parse_setup_data();
+ /* update the e820_saved too */
+ e820_reserve_setup_data();

copy_edd();

@@ -656,7 +674,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
parse_early_param();

/* after early param, so could get panic from serial */
- reserve_setup_data();
+ reserve_early_setup_data();

if (acpi_mps_check()) {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC

2008-07-03 18:39:23

by Yinghai Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] x86: let early_reserve_e820 update e820_saved too


so when it is called after early_param, e820_saved get updated too.
esp for mpc update.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -414,8 +414,9 @@ static int __init append_e820_map(struct
return __append_e820_map(biosmap, nr_map);
}

-u64 __init e820_update_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
- unsigned new_type)
+static u64 __init e820_update_range_map(struct e820map *e820x, u64 start,
+ u64 size, unsigned old_type,
+ unsigned new_type)
{
int i;
u64 real_updated_size = 0;
@@ -426,7 +427,7 @@ u64 __init e820_update_range(u64 start,
size = ULLONG_MAX - start;

for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
- struct e820entry *ei = &e820.map[i];
+ struct e820entry *ei = &e820x->map[i];
u64 final_start, final_end;
if (ei->type != old_type)
continue;
@@ -454,6 +455,19 @@ u64 __init e820_update_range(u64 start,
return real_updated_size;
}

+u64 __init e820_update_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
+ unsigned new_type)
+{
+ return e820_update_range_map(&e820, start, size, old_type, new_type);
+}
+
+static u64 __init e820_update_range_saved(u64 start, u64 size,
+ unsigned old_type, unsigned new_type)
+{
+ return e820_update_range_map(&e820_saved, start, size, old_type,
+ new_type);
+}
+
/* make e820 not cover the range */
u64 __init e820_remove_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
int checktype)
@@ -503,6 +517,15 @@ void __init update_e820(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "modified physical RAM map:\n");
e820_print_map("modified");
}
+static void __init update_e820_saved(void)
+{
+ int nr_map;
+
+ nr_map = e820_saved.nr_map;
+ if (sanitize_e820_map(e820_saved.map, ARRAY_SIZE(e820_saved.map), &nr_map))
+ return;
+ e820_saved.nr_map = nr_map;
+}
#define MAX_GAP_END 0x100000000ull
/*
* Search for a gap in the e820 memory space from start_addr to end_addr.
@@ -1007,8 +1030,10 @@ u64 __init early_reserve_e820(u64 startt

addr = round_down(start + size - sizet, align);
e820_update_range(addr, sizet, E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED);
+ e820_update_range_saved(addr, sizet, E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED);
printk(KERN_INFO "update e820 for early_reserve_e820\n");
update_e820();
+ update_e820_saved();

return addr;
}

2008-07-03 21:01:21

by Bernhard Walle

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make e820_saved have update from setup_data

* Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> [2008-07-03 11:37]:
>
> + /* update the e820_saved too */
> + e820_reserve_setup_data();

Why do you want to update the e820_saved here? /sys/firmware/memmap
should provide the real BIOS-provided memory map, IMO ...



Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development

2008-07-03 21:32:19

by Yinghai Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make e820_saved have update from setup_data

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Bernhard Walle <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> [2008-07-03 11:37]:
>>
>> + /* update the e820_saved too */
>> + e820_reserve_setup_data();
>
> Why do you want to update the e820_saved here? /sys/firmware/memmap
> should provide the real BIOS-provided memory map, IMO ...

that setup_data is another half memmap for efi.

YH

2008-07-03 22:51:08

by H. Peter Anvin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make e820_saved have update from setup_data

Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> [2008-07-03 11:37]:
>> + /* update the e820_saved too */
>> + e820_reserve_setup_data();
>
> Why do you want to update the e820_saved here? /sys/firmware/memmap
> should provide the real BIOS-provided memory map, IMO ...

I would concur with that.

-hpa

2008-07-09 05:50:32

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: move saving e820_saved to setup_memory_map


* Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> wrote:

> so other path that will override memory_setup or
> machine_specific_memory_setup could have e820_saved too

applied to tip/x86/core, thanks Yinghai.

Ingo

2008-07-09 05:51:24

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: let early_reserve_e820 update e820_saved too


* Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> wrote:

> so when it is called after early_param, e820_saved get updated too.
> esp for mpc update.

applied to tip/x86/core, thanks Yinghai.

Ingo