> Support the Matrox G200eV chip, based on timings that I found in the
> X.org matrox driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
> ---
>
Is the new chip requires some changes in handling (e.g. diffrent clock ranges/setting, etc)?
There is nothing about timings in the patch (aside 230MHz).
Kind regards,
Krzysztof
> drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_base.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_base.c
> b/drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_base.c
> index c021362..8e7a275 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_base.c
> @@ -1453,6 +1453,13 @@ static struct board {
> MGA_G100,
> &vbG100,
> "MGA-G100 (AGP)"},
> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200EV_PCI, 0xFF,
> + 0, 0,
> + DEVF_G200,
> + 230000,
> + MGA_G200,
> + &vbG200,
> + "MGA-G200eV (PCI)"},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200_PCI, 0xFF,
> 0, 0,
> DEVF_G200,
> @@ -2118,6 +2125,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id matroxfb_devices[] = {
> PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G100_AGP,
> PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200EV_PCI,
> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200_PCI,
> PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200_AGP,
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> index f1624b3..6260fab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> @@ -577,6 +577,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200_PCI 0x0520
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200_AGP 0x0521
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G400 0x0525
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G200EV_PCI 0x0530
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_G550 0x2527
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MATROX_VIA 0x4536
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-fbdev-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-devel
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zapytaj o Milosc, Prace, Zdrowie, Rodzine ...
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1f27
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 11:29:33AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > Support the Matrox G200eV chip, based on timings that I found in the
> > X.org matrox driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
>
> Is the new chip requires some changes in handling (e.g. diffrent clock ranges/setting, etc)?
> There is nothing about timings in the patch (aside 230MHz).
As far as I could tell from the corresponding patch to Xorg there aren't
any changes needed... but so far it's only passed the smoke test and the
"it appears to work on my machine" test. :)
--D