2008-10-14 01:41:22

by Roland McGrath

Subject: [PATCH] x86 syscall.h: fix argument order

Petr Tesarik noticed that I'd bungled the syscall_get_arguments code for
64-bit kernels, so it inverted the order of the syscall argument registers.
Petr wrote a patch to fix that, and I've amended it to fix the same braino
in the syscall_set_arguments code.

Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
---
include/asm-x86/syscall.h | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-x86/syscall.h b/include/asm-x86/syscall.h
index 04c47dc..ec2a95e 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/syscall.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/syscall.h
@@ -93,26 +93,26 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
{
# ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
if (task_thread_info(task)->status & TS_COMPAT)
- switch (i + n) {
- case 6:
+ switch (i) {
+ case 0:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->bp;
- case 5:
+ *args++ = regs->bx;
+ case 1:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->di;
- case 4:
+ *args++ = regs->cx;
+ case 2:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->si;
+ *args++ = regs->dx;
case 3:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->dx;
- case 2:
+ *args++ = regs->si;
+ case 4:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->cx;
- case 1:
+ *args++ = regs->di;
+ case 5:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->bx;
- case 0:
+ *args++ = regs->bp;
+ case 6:
if (!n--) break;
default:
BUG();
@@ -120,26 +120,26 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
}
else
# endif
- switch (i + n) {
- case 6:
+ switch (i) {
+ case 0:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->r9;
- case 5:
+ *args++ = regs->di;
+ case 1:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->r8;
- case 4:
+ *args++ = regs->si;
+ case 2:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->r10;
+ *args++ = regs->dx;
case 3:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->dx;
- case 2:
+ *args++ = regs->r10;
+ case 4:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->si;
- case 1:
+ *args++ = regs->r8;
+ case 5:
if (!n--) break;
- *args++ = regs->di;
- case 0:
+ *args++ = regs->r9;
+ case 6:
if (!n--) break;
default:
BUG();
@@ -154,55 +154,57 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
{
# ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
if (task_thread_info(task)->status & TS_COMPAT)
- switch (i + n) {
- case 6:
+ switch (i) {
+ case 0:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->bp = *args++;
- case 5:
+ regs->bx = *args++;
+ case 1:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->di = *args++;
- case 4:
+ regs->cx = *args++;
+ case 2:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->si = *args++;
+ regs->dx = *args++;
case 3:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->dx = *args++;
- case 2:
+ regs->si = *args++;
+ case 4:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->cx = *args++;
- case 1:
+ regs->di = *args++;
+ case 5:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->bx = *args++;
- case 0:
+ regs->bp = *args++;
+ case 6:
if (!n--) break;
default:
BUG();
+ break;
}
else
# endif
- switch (i + n) {
- case 6:
+ switch (i) {
+ case 0:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->r9 = *args++;
- case 5:
+ regs->di = *args++;
+ case 1:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->r8 = *args++;
- case 4:
+ regs->si = *args++;
+ case 2:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->r10 = *args++;
+ regs->dx = *args++;
case 3:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->dx = *args++;
- case 2:
+ regs->r10 = *args++;
+ case 4:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->si = *args++;
- case 1:
+ regs->r8 = *args++;
+ case 5:
if (!n--) break;
- regs->di = *args++;
- case 0:
+ regs->r9 = *args++;
+ case 6:
if (!n--) break;
default:
BUG();
+ break;
}
}

2008-10-22 14:54:42

by Ingo Molnar

Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 syscall.h: fix argument order

* Roland McGrath <[email protected]> wrote:

> Petr Tesarik noticed that I'd bungled the syscall_get_arguments code for
> 64-bit kernels, so it inverted the order of the syscall argument registers.
> Petr wrote a patch to fix that, and I've amended it to fix the same braino
> in the syscall_set_arguments code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/asm-x86/syscall.h | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks! I added an:

Original-by: Petr Tesarik <[email protected]>

because Petr's SOB on the first line looks weird.

Ingo