2008-12-07 07:57:08

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect use of loose in wext.c

From: Nick Andrew <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:08:09 +1100

> Fix incorrect use of loose in wext.c
>
> It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <[email protected]>

Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks Nick.

BTW, your original posting of this patch didn't make it to the mailing
lists because there were people's names on the CC: list which had a
"." character in them, and in such cases these names must be fully
surrounded by double quotes, otherwise it is an SMTP syntax error.

Please be mindful of this in the future.

> ---
>
> net/wireless/wext.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/wext.c b/net/wireless/wext.c
> index d98ffb7..e49a2d1 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/wext.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/wext.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
> * o Remove spy_offset from struct iw_handler_def
> * o Start deprecating dev->get_wireless_stats, output a warning
> * o If IW_QUAL_DBM is set, show dBm values in /proc/net/wireless
> - * o Don't loose INVALID/DBM flags when clearing UPDATED flags (iwstats)
> + * o Don't lose INVALID/DBM flags when clearing UPDATED flags (iwstats)
> *
> * v8 - 17.02.06 - Jean II
> * o RtNetlink requests support (SET/GET)
>
>


2008-12-07 23:56:23

by Nick Andrew

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect use of loose in wext.c

On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:56:55PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Andrew <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:08:09 +1100
>
> > Fix incorrect use of loose in wext.c
> >
> > It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <[email protected]>
>
> Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks Nick.

Thanks for your help.

> BTW, your original posting of this patch didn't make it to the mailing
> lists because there were people's names on the CC: list which had a
> "." character in them, and in such cases these names must be fully
> surrounded by double quotes, otherwise it is an SMTP syntax error.
>
> Please be mindful of this in the future.

Yes, it looks like "stg mail" doesn't do address quoting on the names
which were added by grabbing Signed-off-by: lines. LKML rejected the
post but the other recipients probably received it, meaning they end
up with two copies (sorry folks). I'll be watching out for that in
future patches.

Nick.
--
PGP Key ID = 0x418487E7 http://www.nick-andrew.net/
PGP Key fingerprint = B3ED 6894 8E49 1770 C24A 67E3 6266 6EB9 4184 87E7