> And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a
> 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It
> does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be
> used anywhere.
I have no idea who uses it. I just assume that anyone who is using it
might be expecting it to be reliable for security purposes as advertised.
Thanks,
Roland