fix those errors:
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c: In function ‘pdc_data_xfer_vlb’:
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: ‘ap’ undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c: At top level:
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:869: error: ‘ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE’ undeclared here (not in a
+function)
make[2]: *** [drivers/ata/pata_legacy.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/ata] Error 2
>From 171dedab9e29534e911e0f4d23ea0a183edf75e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhenwen Xu <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:30:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix error on drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
Signed-off-by: Zhenwen Xu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c | 13 +++++++------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c b/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
index 6f985be..f72c6c5 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
@@ -285,10 +285,11 @@ static unsigned int pdc_data_xfer_vlb(struct ata_device *dev,
unsigned char *buf, unsigned int buflen, int rw)
{
int slop = buflen & 3;
+ struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
+
/* 32bit I/O capable *and* we need to write a whole number of dwords */
if (ata_id_has_dword_io(dev->id) && (slop == 0 || slop == 3)
&& (ap->pflags & ATA_PFLAG_PIO32)) {
- struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
@@ -866,7 +867,7 @@ static struct legacy_controller controllers[] = {
0, 0, NULL },
{"PDC20230", &pdc20230_port_ops, 0x7,
ATA_FLAG_NO_IORDY,
- ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE, NULL },
+ ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32CHANGE, NULL },
{"HT6560A", &ht6560a_port_ops, 0x07,
ATA_FLAG_NO_IORDY, 0, NULL },
{"HT6560B", &ht6560b_port_ops, 0x1F,
@@ -877,13 +878,13 @@ static struct legacy_controller controllers[] = {
0, 0, NULL },
{"QDI6500", &qdi6500_port_ops, 0x07,
ATA_FLAG_NO_IORDY,
- ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE, qdi_port },
+ ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32CHANGE, qdi_port },
{"QDI6580", &qdi6580_port_ops, 0x1F,
- 0, ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE, qdi_port },
+ 0, ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32CHANGE, qdi_port },
{"QDI6580DP", &qdi6580dp_port_ops, 0x1F,
- 0, ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE, qdi_port },
+ 0, ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32CHANGE, qdi_port },
{"W83759A", &winbond_port_ops, 0x1F,
- 0, ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE,
+ 0, ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 | ATA_PFLAG_PIO32CHANGE,
winbond_port }
};
--
1.5.6.5
--
---------------------------------
Zhenwen Xu - Open and Free
Home Page: http://zhwen.org
My Studio: http://dim4.cn
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:32:59 +0800
Zhenwen Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> fix those errors:
>
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c: In function ‘pdc_data_xfer_vlb’:
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: ‘ap’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: for each function it appears in.)
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c: At top level:
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:869: error: ‘ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE’ undeclared here (not in a
> +function)
> make[2]: *** [drivers/ata/pata_legacy.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/ata] Error 2
Looks good to me. I shall have to find something larger than PROPOSED in
the patch title to stop Jeff applying things that were discussion code
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:32:59 +0800
> Zhenwen Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> fix those errors:
>>
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c: In function ‘pdc_data_xfer_vlb’:
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: ‘ap’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:289: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c: At top level:
>> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c:869: error: ‘ATA_PFLAG_PIO32_CHANGE’ undeclared here (not in a
>> +function)
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/ata/pata_legacy.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/ata] Error 2
>
> Looks good to me. I shall have to find something larger than PROPOSED in
> the patch title to stop Jeff applying things that were discussion code
It had a 'signed-off-by', which I took to mean, it was a proposed patch
that was OK to merge once people were happy... Sorry about that
misinterpretation.
Jeff