On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:05:19AM -0400, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/5/5 David VomLehn <[email protected]>:
> > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:55:39PM -0400, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:30:00 -0700
> >> David VomLehn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Alan Stern <[email protected]
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> >> > index 6f51ca4..735b061 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > ...
> >> > @@ -1834,6 +1834,7 @@ static int do_scan_async(void *_data)
> >> > ? ? struct async_scan_data *data = _data;
> >> > ? ? do_scsi_scan_host(data->shost);
> >> > ? ? scsi_finish_async_scan(data);
> >> > + ? initdev_probe_done(BOOTDEV_BLOCK_MASK);
> >>
> >> Which code are waiting for the block device's probe done?
> >
> > None yet. That remains to be done.
> >
>
> Would you mind submitting the code path of waitting for probe done to allow a
> intact review? Without the waitting code, it is a a little difficult
> to undersand or verify
> your patch, IMHO.
This will be in the next spin of the patch, coming soon (possibly today).
> Thanks
> Lei Ming
David VomLehn