2009-06-16 01:01:06

by Chris Mason

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [GIT PULL] Btrfs bug fix

Hello,

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master

Has a fix for the new space balancing code (btrfs-vol -b). The bug can
trigger a corruption if you run the balancing with multiple subvolumes
and unmount without doing anything in the subvolumes.

Yan Zheng (1) commits (+6/-6):
Btrfs: always update root items for fs trees at commit time

Total: (1) commits

fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


2009-06-16 01:22:04

by Ed Tomlinson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs bug fix

On Monday 15 June 2009 21:00:45 Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello,
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master
>
> Has a fix for the new space balancing code (btrfs-vol -b). The bug can
> trigger a corruption if you run the balancing with multiple subvolumes
> and unmount without doing anything in the subvolumes.
>
> Yan Zheng (1) commits (+6/-6):
> Btrfs: always update root items for fs trees at commit time
>
> Total: (1) commits
>
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Does this apply when using newformat2 branch too? If so, it looks like its not been updated.

TIA
Ed Tomlinson

2009-06-16 02:10:43

by Chris Mason

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs bug fix

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009 21:00:45 Chris Mason wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master
> >
> > Has a fix for the new space balancing code (btrfs-vol -b). The bug can
> > trigger a corruption if you run the balancing with multiple subvolumes
> > and unmount without doing anything in the subvolumes.
> >
> > Yan Zheng (1) commits (+6/-6):
> > Btrfs: always update root items for fs trees at commit time
> >
> > Total: (1) commits
> >
> > fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Does this apply when using newformat2 branch too? If so, it looks like its not been updated.

I've updated newformat2 as well.

-chris