Greetings all;
Just a heads up on 2.6.30.1, from logwatch's email:
--------------------- XNTPD Begin ------------------------
Time Reset 47 times (total: 11.411157 s average: 0.242791 s)
Total synchronizations 74 (hosts: 4)
---------------------- XNTPD End -------------------------
2.6.30 didn't, with a lot more uptime, appear to need near as much support
from the pool.ntp.org folks.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
Big M, Little M, many mumbling mice
Are making midnight music in the moonlight,
Mighty nice!
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Gene Heskett<[email protected]> wrote:
> Just a heads up on 2.6.30.1, from logwatch's email:
>
> ?--------------------- XNTPD Begin ------------------------
>
>
> ?Time Reset 47 times (total: 11.411157 s ?average: 0.242791 s)
>
> ?Total synchronizations 74 (hosts: 4)
>
> ?---------------------- XNTPD End -------------------------
> 2.6.30 didn't, with a lot more uptime, appear to need near as much support
> from the pool.ntp.org folks.
I don't see anything in the 2.6.30.1 patch that would effect NTP. Do
you have any peerstats/clockstats data? What does ntpdc -c peers and
ntpdc -c kerninfo show?
thanks
-john