This patch moves the state residency accounting and statistics
computation off the hot exit path.
On exit, the need to recompute statistics is recorded, and new
statistics will be computed when menu_select is called again.
Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index f1df59f..5e905e0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
struct menu_device {
int last_state_idx;
+ int needs_update;
unsigned int expected_us;
unsigned int predicted_us;
@@ -29,6 +30,8 @@ struct menu_device {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);
+static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
+
/**
* menu_select - selects the next idle state to enter
* @dev: the CPU
@@ -39,6 +42,11 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
int latency_req = pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
int i;
+ if (data->needs_update) {
+ menu_update(dev);
+ data->needs_update = 0;
+ }
+
/* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
if (unlikely(latency_req == 0)) {
data->last_state_idx = 0;
@@ -72,7 +80,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
}
/**
- * menu_reflect - attempts to guess what happened after entry
+ * menu_reflect - records that data structures need update
* @dev: the CPU
*
* NOTE: it's important to be fast here because this operation will add to
@@ -81,6 +89,16 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
+ data->needs_update = 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * menu_update - attempts to guess what happened after entry
+ * @dev: the CPU
+ */
+static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
+{
+ struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
int last_idx = data->last_state_idx;
unsigned int last_idle_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev);
struct cpuidle_state *target = &dev->states[last_idx];
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:59:46 +0200
Corrado Zoccolo <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch moves the state residency accounting and statistics
> computation off the hot exit path.
> On exit, the need to recompute statistics is recorded, and new
> statistics will be computed when menu_select is called again.
>
Was there any observed and/or measured effect as a result of this patch?
If so, please send a description of that effect, thanks.
Hi Andrew,
the expected effect is to reduce processor wakeup latency from sleep (C-states).
We are speaking of few hundreds of cycles reduction out of a several
microseconds latency (determined by the hardware transition), so it is
difficult to measure.
Corrado
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Andrew
Morton<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:59:46 +0200
> Corrado Zoccolo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This patch moves the state residency accounting and statistics
>> computation off the hot exit path.
>> On exit, the need to recompute statistics is recorded, and new
>> statistics will be computed when menu_select is called again.
>>
>
> Was there any observed and/or measured effect as a result of this patch?
>
> If so, please send a description of that effect, thanks.
>
>
--
__________________________________________________________________________
dott. Corrado Zoccolo mailto:[email protected]
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------