Greetings,
the two remainting patches of the nohz performance work I've been
doing. Both have been sent to the mailing lists before. Ingo had
a comment about patch #1, but no one but me seems to be interested
in patch #2. Neverless I would like to get both patches upstream.
I can create a branch for them on git390 but I feel that they should
go the path all the other nohz/time/clocksource patches went.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Martin,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> Greetings,
> the two remainting patches of the nohz performance work I've been
> doing. Both have been sent to the mailing lists before. Ingo had
> a comment about patch #1, but no one but me seems to be interested
> in patch #2. Neverless I would like to get both patches upstream.
> I can create a branch for them on git390 but I feel that they should
> go the path all the other nohz/time/clocksource patches went.
Sorry, that's my fault. I forgot them over the watchdog
wreckage. Picking them up now.
Thanks,
tglx
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:06:42 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > the two remainting patches of the nohz performance work I've been
> > doing. Both have been sent to the mailing lists before. Ingo had
> > a comment about patch #1, but no one but me seems to be interested
> > in patch #2. Neverless I would like to get both patches upstream.
> > I can create a branch for them on git390 but I feel that they should
> > go the path all the other nohz/time/clocksource patches went.
>
> Sorry, that's my fault. I forgot them over the watchdog
> wreckage. Picking them up now.
Thats great, thanks. And yes the clocksource/watchdog problems have
been painful..
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Moin Thomas,
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:06:42 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > the two remainting patches of the nohz performance work I've been
> > doing. Both have been sent to the mailing lists before. Ingo had
> > a comment about patch #1, but no one but me seems to be interested
> > in patch #2. Neverless I would like to get both patches upstream.
> > I can create a branch for them on git390 but I feel that they should
> > go the path all the other nohz/time/clocksource patches went.
>
> Sorry, that's my fault. I forgot them over the watchdog
> wreckage. Picking them up now.
I could not find the patches on tip timers/core. Where did you put them ?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
* Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> Moin Thomas,
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:06:42 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Martin,
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings,
> > > the two remainting patches of the nohz performance work I've been
> > > doing. Both have been sent to the mailing lists before. Ingo had
> > > a comment about patch #1, but no one but me seems to be interested
> > > in patch #2. Neverless I would like to get both patches upstream.
> > > I can create a branch for them on git390 but I feel that they should
> > > go the path all the other nohz/time/clocksource patches went.
> >
> > Sorry, that's my fault. I forgot them over the watchdog
> > wreckage. Picking them up now.
>
> I could not find the patches on tip timers/core. Where did you put them ?
these are the currently pending patches in tip:timers/core:
3c5d92a: nohz: Introduce arch_needs_cpu
eed3b9c: nohz: Reuse ktime in sub-functions of tick_check_idle.
7bc7d63: time: Remove xtime_cache
a092ff0: time: Implement logarithmic time accumulation
Ingo
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:41:38 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Moin Thomas,
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:06:42 +0200 (CEST)
> > Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > > the two remainting patches of the nohz performance work I've been
> > > > doing. Both have been sent to the mailing lists before. Ingo had
> > > > a comment about patch #1, but no one but me seems to be interested
> > > > in patch #2. Neverless I would like to get both patches upstream.
> > > > I can create a branch for them on git390 but I feel that they should
> > > > go the path all the other nohz/time/clocksource patches went.
> > >
> > > Sorry, that's my fault. I forgot them over the watchdog
> > > wreckage. Picking them up now.
> >
> > I could not find the patches on tip timers/core. Where did you put them ?
>
> these are the currently pending patches in tip:timers/core:
>
> 3c5d92a: nohz: Introduce arch_needs_cpu
> eed3b9c: nohz: Reuse ktime in sub-functions of tick_check_idle.
> 7bc7d63: time: Remove xtime_cache
> a092ff0: time: Implement logarithmic time accumulation
Thanks for the list. Thomas added 3c5d92a and eed3b9c yesterday and
I am happy now. I have two more optimization patches for the clockevents
code, but I'm not don't quite content with them yet.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.