Bug 14594 has been fixed with commit
e29d4363174949a7a4e46f670993d7ff43342c1c for 2.6.32 a month ago, but
2.6.28 - 2.6.31.7 are still affected.
Any plans to apply this at least for 2.6.31.8, too ?
Regards,
Frank Schaefer
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:55:24PM +0100, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> Bug 14594 has been fixed with commit
> e29d4363174949a7a4e46f670993d7ff43342c1c for 2.6.32 a month ago, but
> 2.6.28 - 2.6.31.7 are still affected.
> Any plans to apply this at least for 2.6.31.8, too ?
It was never sent to the [email protected] alias so how would I know to
apply this?
I'll queue it up for the next round.
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg KH schrieb:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:55:24PM +0100, Frank Schaefer wrote:
>
>> Bug 14594 has been fixed with commit
>> e29d4363174949a7a4e46f670993d7ff43342c1c for 2.6.32 a month ago, but
>> 2.6.28 - 2.6.31.7 are still affected.
>> Any plans to apply this at least for 2.6.31.8, too ?
>>
>
> It was never sent to the [email protected] alias so how would I know to
> apply this?
>
I suspected that... no problem.
Btw, am I the one who is supposed to close this bug, too ? ;)
> I'll queue it up for the next round.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Thanks,
Frank Schaefer
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> Greg KH schrieb:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:55:24PM +0100, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> >
> >> Bug 14594 has been fixed with commit
> >> e29d4363174949a7a4e46f670993d7ff43342c1c for 2.6.32 a month ago, but
> >> 2.6.28 - 2.6.31.7 are still affected.
> >> Any plans to apply this at least for 2.6.31.8, too ?
> >>
> >
> > It was never sent to the [email protected] alias so how would I know to
> > apply this?
> >
> I suspected that... no problem.
> Btw, am I the one who is supposed to close this bug, too ? ;)
I have no idea, the owner should.
greg k-h
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:55:24PM +0100, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> Bug 14594 has been fixed with commit
> e29d4363174949a7a4e46f670993d7ff43342c1c for 2.6.32 a month ago, but
> 2.6.28 - 2.6.31.7 are still affected.
> Any plans to apply this at least for 2.6.31.8, too ?
Now queued up.
thanks,
greg k-h