Hi all,
Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed,
but still not fixed:-)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21
Sure I could be missing some other postings :-)
Who could take care of it? And should we?
Best regards.
Marin Mitov
[ PCI list and maintainer CC added ]
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Marin Mitov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed,
> but still not fixed:-)
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21
>
> Sure I could be missing some other postings :-)
>
> Who could take care of it? And should we?
I've been wondering about that too.
The patch seems correct to me.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:20:22 +1100
Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> [ PCI list and maintainer CC added ]
>
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Marin Mitov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed,
> > but still not fixed:-)
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21
> >
> > Sure I could be missing some other postings :-)
> >
> > Who could take care of it? And should we?
>
> I've been wondering about that too.
> The patch seems correct to me.
Oh I was thinking David would pick it up.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 08:49 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:20:22 +1100
> Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > [ PCI list and maintainer CC added ]
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Marin Mitov wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed,
> > > but still not fixed:-)
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21
> > >
> > > Sure I could be missing some other postings :-)
> > >
> > > Who could take care of it? And should we?
> >
> > I've been wondering about that too.
> > The patch seems correct to me.
>
> Oh I was thinking David would pick it up.
I did; it's been in my tree for a while.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
[email protected] Intel Corporation
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:55:03PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 08:49 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:20:22 +1100
> > Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > [ PCI list and maintainer CC added ]
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Marin Mitov wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed,
> > > > but still not fixed:-)
> > > >
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21
> > > >
> > > > Sure I could be missing some other postings :-)
> > > >
> > > > Who could take care of it? And should we?
> > >
> > > I've been wondering about that too.
> > > The patch seems correct to me.
> >
> > Oh I was thinking David would pick it up.
>
> I did; it's been in my tree for a while.
My bad, I didn't check there.