2010-01-13 01:00:59

by Jeff Mahoney

Subject: [patch 4/6] acpi: Fix section mismatch

acpi_early_processor_set_pdc uses processor_idle_dmi_table, which is
marked __cpuinitdata. It's only called by acpi_bus_init, which is __init.
We mark it __cpuinit.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 l
return AE_OK;
}

-void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
+void __cpuinit acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
{
/*
* Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM

2010-01-13 03:58:36

by Alex Chiang

Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] acpi: Fix section mismatch

Tony Luck already sent a patch for this to Len Brown (which I
acked).

Thanks,
/ac

* Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>:
> acpi_early_processor_set_pdc uses processor_idle_dmi_table, which is
> marked __cpuinitdata. It's only called by acpi_bus_init, which is __init.
> We mark it __cpuinit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 l
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> -void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
> +void __cpuinit acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
> {
> /*
> * Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
>
>