2010-01-17 23:35:45

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree

Hi Russell,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Makefile between commit 95b8f20fd6a2694a16b8addb190b942bfb670c88
(ARM: fix badly placed mach/plat entries in Kconfig & Makefile"") from
the arm-current tree and commit c4ffccddd54b669cc9683f2c69e31035e916a1a0
("ARM: S5P6440: Add new Kconfig and Makefiles") from the arm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]

(Sorry, cut and paste diff)
diff --cc arch/arm/Makefile
index 9e75825,bbcd512..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
@@@ -184,7 -184,9 +185,8 @@@ plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_ORION) := orio
plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_PXA) := pxa
plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX) := s3c24xx s3c samsung
plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C64XX) := s3c64xx s3c samsung
-plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S5PC1XX) := s5pc1xx s3c samsung
+ plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S5P) := s5p samsung s3c
-plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_STMP3XXX) := stmp3xxx
+plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S5PC1XX) := s5pc1xx s3c samsung

ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110),y)
# This is what happens if you forget the IOCS16 line.


2010-01-18 01:33:21

by Ben Dooks

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:35:34AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/Makefile between commit 95b8f20fd6a2694a16b8addb190b942bfb670c88
> (ARM: fix badly placed mach/plat entries in Kconfig & Makefile"") from
> the arm-current tree and commit c4ffccddd54b669cc9683f2c69e31035e916a1a0
> ("ARM: S5P6440: Add new Kconfig and Makefiles") from the arm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while.

Is that from the merge of next-samsung or from two parts of the ARM
trees?

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
>
> (Sorry, cut and paste diff)
> diff --cc arch/arm/Makefile
> index 9e75825,bbcd512..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@@ -184,7 -184,9 +185,8 @@@ plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_ORION) := orio
> plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_PXA) := pxa
> plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX) := s3c24xx s3c samsung
> plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C64XX) := s3c64xx s3c samsung
> -plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S5PC1XX) := s5pc1xx s3c samsung
> + plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S5P) := s5p samsung s3c
> -plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_STMP3XXX) := stmp3xxx
> +plat-$(CONFIG_PLAT_S5PC1XX) := s5pc1xx s3c samsung
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110),y)
> # This is what happens if you forget the IOCS16 line.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
--
Ben

Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.

2010-01-18 03:34:40

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree

Hi Ben,

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:33:07 +0000 Ben Dooks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is that from the merge of next-samsung or from two parts of the ARM
> trees?

I merged the arm-current tree
(ssh://master.kernel.org/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm.git#master) into
linux-next and then later the arm tree
(ssh://master.kernel.org/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm.git#devel) and the second
merge produced this conflict. However, Russell has merged the samsung
tree (git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git#next-samsung) into the arm
tree, already.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


Attachments:
(No filename) (634.00 B)
(No filename) (198.00 B)
Download all attachments