Hey Thomas, Nick,
I just wanted to let you know I've just finished forward porting Nick's
patches to 2.6.33-rc8-rt2. Luckily my forward port of Nick's patches to
2.6.33 applies on top of the -rt tree without any collisions, and I've
added a handful of maybe sketchy fixups to get it working with -rt.
You can find the patchset here:
http://sr71.net/~jstultz/dbench-scalability/patches/2.6.33-rc8-rt2/vfs-scale.33-rt.tar.bz2
Here's a chart showing how much these patches help dbench numbers on
ramfs:
http://sr71.net/~jstultz/dbench-scalability/graphs/2.6.33/ramfs-dbench.png
I've not done any serious stress testing with the patchset yet, but
wanted to post it for your review.
Nick: I'd appreciate any feedback as to if any of my forward porting has
gone awry. I'm still very green with respect to the vfs, so I don't
doubt there are some issues hiding here.
Thomas: Let me know if you want to start playing with this in the -rt
tree. I'm not seeing any warnings with the debugging options on, so I
think I squashed all of those issues, but let me know if you manage to
trigger anything.
thanks
-john
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:53:28PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> Hey Thomas, Nick,
> I just wanted to let you know I've just finished forward porting Nick's
> patches to 2.6.33-rc8-rt2. Luckily my forward port of Nick's patches to
> 2.6.33 applies on top of the -rt tree without any collisions, and I've
> added a handful of maybe sketchy fixups to get it working with -rt.
>
> You can find the patchset here:
> http://sr71.net/~jstultz/dbench-scalability/patches/2.6.33-rc8-rt2/vfs-scale.33-rt.tar.bz2
>
> Here's a chart showing how much these patches help dbench numbers on
> ramfs:
> http://sr71.net/~jstultz/dbench-scalability/graphs/2.6.33/ramfs-dbench.png
>
> I've not done any serious stress testing with the patchset yet, but
> wanted to post it for your review.
>
> Nick: I'd appreciate any feedback as to if any of my forward porting has
> gone awry. I'm still very green with respect to the vfs, so I don't
> doubt there are some issues hiding here.
BTW there are a few issues Al pointed out. We have to synchronize RCU
after unregistering a filesystem so d_ops/i_ops doesn't go away, and
mntput can sleep so we can't do it under RCU read lock.
The store-free path walk patches don't really have the required RCU
barriers in them either (which is fine for x86, but would have to be
fixed).
