2010-06-22 15:17:53

by Mike McCormack

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

If a process is in more than NGROUPS_SMALL (32) groups, it's not possible
for any other user space process to determine the list of groups it is
in using /proc/<pid>/status.

Increasing the list of groups listed by /proc/<pid>/status would lead to
very long lines that file, and possible misbehavior of userspace programs
that parse /proc/<pid>/status, so instead I have opted to create a new
file /proc/<pid>/groups, which contains the list of supplementary groups
for each pid.

The new file /proc/<pid>/groups consists of a single group id per line,
with each line being 11 characters long. This should be enough space
for 16bit or 32bit group ids.

This feature might be useful for a server listening on a unix domain pipe
to determine the list of groups that a client process is in from its pid.

Signed-off-by: Mike McCormack <[email protected]>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index acb7ef8..689362c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@
#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/cred.h>
+
#include "internal.h"

/* NOTE:
@@ -1325,6 +1327,57 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_pid_set_comm_operations = {
.release = single_release,
};

+/* supplementary groups, one per line */
+static int groups_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = m->private;
+ struct group_info *group_info;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ const struct cred *cred;
+ struct pid *pid;
+ unsigned int g;
+
+ pid = proc_pid(inode);
+ task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ if (!task)
+ return -ESRCH;
+
+ cred = get_task_cred(task);
+ group_info = cred->group_info;
+
+ /*
+ * Groups may be 16bit or 32bit.
+ * Try to be easily machine and human readable.
+ */
+ for (g = 0; g < group_info->ngroups; g++)
+ seq_printf(m, "%-10u\n", GROUP_AT(group_info, g));
+
+ put_cred(cred);
+ put_task_struct(task);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int groups_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = single_open(filp, groups_proc_show, NULL);
+ if (!ret) {
+ struct seq_file *m = filp->private_data;
+
+ m->private = inode;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations proc_groups_operations = {
+ .open = groups_proc_open,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .llseek = seq_lseek,
+ .release = single_release,
+};
+
/*
* We added or removed a vma mapping the executable. The vmas are only mapped
* during exec and are not mapped with the mmap system call.
@@ -2586,6 +2639,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = {
INF("cmdline", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_cmdline),
ONE("stat", S_IRUGO, proc_tgid_stat),
ONE("statm", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_statm),
+ REG("groups", S_IRUSR, proc_groups_operations),
REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_maps_operations),
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
REG("numa_maps", S_IRUGO, proc_numa_maps_operations),
@@ -2921,6 +2975,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {
INF("cmdline", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_cmdline),
ONE("stat", S_IRUGO, proc_tid_stat),
ONE("statm", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_statm),
+ REG("groups", S_IRUSR, proc_groups_operations),
REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_maps_operations),
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
REG("numa_maps", S_IRUGO, proc_numa_maps_operations),
--
1.5.6.5


2010-06-22 16:06:39

by Oleg Nesterov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

On 06/23, Mike McCormack wrote:
>
> The new file /proc/<pid>/groups consists of a single group id per line,
> with each line being 11 characters long. This should be enough space
> for 16bit or 32bit group ids.
>
> This feature might be useful for a server listening on a unix domain pipe
> to determine the list of groups that a client process is in from its pid.

As usual, I can never comment whether we need this or not. Just a minor
nit about the code,

> +static int groups_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = m->private;
> + struct group_info *group_info;
> + struct task_struct *task;
> + const struct cred *cred;
> + struct pid *pid;
> + unsigned int g;
> +
> + pid = proc_pid(inode);
> + task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);

get_proc_task() ?

> + if (!task)
> + return -ESRCH;
> +
> + cred = get_task_cred(task);

OTOH. Not that I think this is terribly important, but I don't think
this needs get_task_struct + get_cred,

group_info = NULL;

rcu_read_lock();
task = pid_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
if (task) {
group_info = _task_cred(task)->group_info;
get_group_info(group_info);
}
rcu_read_unlock();

if (!group_info)
retrn ESRCH;

Feel free to ignore though.

Oleg.

2010-06-22 22:38:58

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:07:26 +0900
Mike McCormack <[email protected]> wrote:

> If a process is in more than NGROUPS_SMALL (32) groups, it's not possible
> for any other user space process to determine the list of groups it is
> in using /proc/<pid>/status.
>
> Increasing the list of groups listed by /proc/<pid>/status would lead to
> very long lines that file, and possible misbehavior of userspace programs
> that parse /proc/<pid>/status, so instead I have opted to create a new
> file /proc/<pid>/groups, which contains the list of supplementary groups
> for each pid.
>
> The new file /proc/<pid>/groups consists of a single group id per line,
> with each line being 11 characters long. This should be enough space
> for 16bit or 32bit group ids.
>
> This feature might be useful for a server listening on a unix domain pipe
> to determine the list of groups that a client process is in from its pid.

"might be"?

It would be useful to hear a bit more about usage scenarios, why this
is needed, etc - some hard info which would justify permanent extension
of the kernel->userspace API. How does this get used, why is it
needed, what are the alternatives, etc.

I don't recall having heard of anyone using the groups fields in
/proc/pid/status before.

2010-06-23 00:10:19

by KOSAKI Motohiro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

> If a process is in more than NGROUPS_SMALL (32) groups, it's not possible
> for any other user space process to determine the list of groups it is
> in using /proc/<pid>/status.
>
> Increasing the list of groups listed by /proc/<pid>/status would lead to
> very long lines that file, and possible misbehavior of userspace programs
> that parse /proc/<pid>/status, so instead I have opted to create a new
> file /proc/<pid>/groups, which contains the list of supplementary groups
> for each pid.
>
> The new file /proc/<pid>/groups consists of a single group id per line,
> with each line being 11 characters long. This should be enough space
> for 16bit or 32bit group ids.
>
> This feature might be useful for a server listening on a unix domain pipe
> to determine the list of groups that a client process is in from its pid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike McCormack <[email protected]>

Just dumb question.

Why don't you fix /proc/<pid>/status? Can we share your worry? I haven't review your patch
carefully yet. but your groups_proc_show() seems don't have heavy weight lock.

note: I'm not against your plan. it's just curiosity.

2010-06-23 15:00:18

by Mike McCormack

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

Andrew Morton wrote:

>> This feature might be useful for a server listening on a unix domain pipe
>> to determine the list of groups that a client process is in from its pid.
>
> "might be"?

Well, "would be" :-)

> It would be useful to hear a bit more about usage scenarios, why this
> is needed, etc - some hard info which would justify permanent extension
> of the kernel->userspace API. How does this get used, why is it
> needed, what are the alternatives, etc.

This will be used in a device with groups permissions checked in userspace.

Say you have a process called "telephony-server", and it talks to a number
of client processes with different privilege levels via a unix domain socket.

telephony-server might be able do things which should have different privilege
levels, like send SMS messages, make phone calls, download firmware to a 3G
modem, etc. The client processes would be members of groups reflecting
each privilege. Depending on the number of similar servers in the system,
and how fine-grained the privileges are, there might be lots of groups (>32).

telephony-server should be able to allow or deny requests depending on whether
an application is a member of the correct group or not.

unix sockets can pass credentials, but currently I can only see struct ucred
(pid, uid and gid) being passed. Using the pid, /proc/pid/status can be read
for a list of groups, but it only lists up to 32 groups.

Ways I can see to get the groups for a unix socket peer from it's pid all
mostly require some kernel modification:

* modify kernel to list all groups in /proc/<pid>/status
- very long lines become possible in status file
- no way to know whether you're using an old kernel with 32 group limit
or new kernel and pid only has 32 groups

* modify kernel to add /proc/<pid>/groups
- more kernel-userland interface

* implement LOCAL_CREDS for unix domain sockets in Linux
- work

* limit number of groups to 32
- limit is imposed by /proc code

* create multiple unix domian sockets per privilege with group r/w only
- seems like trouble


What do you think?

thanks,

Mike

2010-06-24 02:41:47

by KOSAKI Motohiro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

> * modify kernel to list all groups in /proc/<pid>/status
> - very long lines become possible in status file
> - no way to know whether you're using an old kernel with 32 group limit
> or new kernel and pid only has 32 groups

Is this necessary? Why?
Who need 32 groups limitation?


> * modify kernel to add /proc/<pid>/groups
> - more kernel-userland interface

My personal opinion (aka my personal prefer) is,
- If fixing /proc/<pid>/status is zero downside, it should do.
- If fixing /proc/</pid>status is some downside (e.g. performance down),
/proc/<pid>groups is better

because, 99% user don't use >32groups.


And, personally I dislike following three ;)

> * implement LOCAL_CREDS for unix domain sockets in Linux
> - work
>
> * limit number of groups to 32
> - limit is imposed by /proc code
>
> * create multiple unix domian sockets per privilege with group r/w only
> - seems like trouble