2010-08-18 06:44:21

by Cong Wang

Subject: [Patch] vmcore: it is not experimental any more

We use vmcore in our production kernel for a long time,
it is pretty stable now. So I don't think we need to mark
it as experimental any more.

Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[email protected]>

---
diff --git a/fs/proc/Kconfig b/fs/proc/Kconfig
index 50f8f06..3df4257 100644
--- a/fs/proc/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/proc/Kconfig
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config PROC_KCORE
depends on PROC_FS && MMU

config PROC_VMCORE
- bool "/proc/vmcore support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ bool "/proc/vmcore support"
depends on PROC_FS && CRASH_DUMP
default y
help

2010-08-22 17:02:21

by Neil Horman

Subject: Re: [Patch] vmcore: it is not experimental any more

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:48:28PM +0800, Am?rico Wang wrote:
>
> We use vmcore in our production kernel for a long time,
> it is pretty stable now. So I don't think we need to mark
> it as experimental any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/proc/Kconfig b/fs/proc/Kconfig
> index 50f8f06..3df4257 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/proc/Kconfig
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config PROC_KCORE
> depends on PROC_FS && MMU
>
> config PROC_VMCORE
> - bool "/proc/vmcore support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> + bool "/proc/vmcore support"
> depends on PROC_FS && CRASH_DUMP
> default y
> help
Acked-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>