Hello,
I know that a sysfs file may be pollable but I'm asking to myself how
it could be difficult adding notifying support also.
Maybe adding a call to the fsnotify subsystem within the
sysfs_notify() function as follow can do the trick?
diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
index da3fefe..afee69f 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
@@ -484,8 +486,10 @@ void sysfs_notify(struct kobject *k, const char
*dir, const
sd = sysfs_find_dirent(sd, NULL, dir);
if (sd && attr)
sd = sysfs_find_dirent(sd, NULL, attr);
- if (sd)
+ if (sd) {
sysfs_notify_dirent(sd);
+ fsnotify_change(dentry, ATTR_SIZE);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&sysfs_mutex);
}
However my problem is how to get the struct dentry pointer needed by
fsnotify_change() related to the struct sysfs_dirent pointer passed to
sysfs_notify(). :(
Can you please give me any advice about to solve it?
Another question: in file linux/fs/sysfs/file.c I see:
#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
but none of its functions are called into file.c... maybe it's a
mistake?
Thanks in advance,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [email protected]
Linux Device Driver [email protected]
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
Freelance ICT Italia - Consulente ICT Italia - http://www.consulenti-ict.it
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:42:47PM +0100, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that a sysfs file may be pollable but I'm asking to myself how
> it could be difficult adding notifying support also.
>
> Maybe adding a call to the fsnotify subsystem within the
> sysfs_notify() function as follow can do the trick?
Perhaps, does that work?
> However my problem is how to get the struct dentry pointer needed by
> fsnotify_change() related to the struct sysfs_dirent pointer passed to
> sysfs_notify(). :(
Yup, that's a problem :(
> Can you please give me any advice about to solve it?
>
> Another question: in file linux/fs/sysfs/file.c I see:
>
> #include <linux/fsnotify.h>
>
> but none of its functions are called into file.c... maybe it's a
> mistake?
Possibly, but look at the patch that added that line, perhaps it was put
there for a reason.
thanks,
greg k-h