This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
Subject : Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
Submitter : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
References : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02235.html
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
> Subject : Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
> Submitter : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
> References : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02235.html
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.
Larry
On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
> > Subject : Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
> > Submitter : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
> > References : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02235.html
> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
>
> Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 05:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
> > Subject : Regression in 2.6.37-rc1 for Intel 945 Graphics Adapter - bisected to commit e9e331a
> > Submitter : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-11-11 01:56 (49 days old)
> > References : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31803
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128944001311444&w=2
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02235.html
> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359472/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359502/
>
> Neither 2.6.37-rc8 nor the patches listed above fix my system.
Does reverting commit 448f53a "drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC
clocks" help?
Rafael