2011-02-03 05:27:54

by KOSAKI Motohiro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] mm: Convert anon_vma->lock to a mutex

> Straight fwd conversion of anon_vma->lock to a mutex.
>
> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

Don't I ack this series at previous iteration? If not, Hmmm.. I haven't remenber
the reason. Anyway
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>




2011-02-03 15:04:56

by Peter Zijlstra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] mm: Convert anon_vma->lock to a mutex

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:27 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Straight fwd conversion of anon_vma->lock to a mutex.
> >
> > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
>
> Don't I ack this series at previous iteration? If not, Hmmm.. I haven't remenber
> the reason.

I got a +1 email from you on the spinlock to mutex conversion patch, I
wasn't quite sure to what tag that translated.

> Anyway
> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>

Is this for this particular patch, or for the series?

2011-02-04 04:35:34

by KOSAKI Motohiro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] mm: Convert anon_vma->lock to a mutex

> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:27 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > Straight fwd conversion of anon_vma->lock to a mutex.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> >
> > Don't I ack this series at previous iteration? If not, Hmmm.. I haven't remenber
> > the reason.
>
> I got a +1 email from you on the spinlock to mutex conversion patch, I
> wasn't quite sure to what tag that translated.

I'm sorry. Maybe Im busy and I wrote unkindly mail. yes, it's my fault.


> > Anyway
> > Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>
>
> Is this for this particular patch, or for the series?

series. please.