2011-05-06 23:56:55

by J Freyensee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel

>From [email protected] # This line is ignored.
From: [email protected]
Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
In-Reply-To: [email protected]


2011-05-07 00:34:11

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:56:46PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> >From [email protected] # This line is ignored.
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
> In-Reply-To: [email protected]

What was this?

2011-05-09 19:07:30

by J Freyensee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:33 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:56:46PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > >From [email protected] # This line is ignored.
> > From: [email protected]
> > Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
> > In-Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> What was this?

That's a good question...I guess that didn't come out well :-/.

It was just a summary of the latest patches I submitted on Friday,
highlighting that the summary of changes this time were mainly cosmetic.
Nothing to patch against the kernel.