that particular documentation file is clearly out of date. i can
take a shot at bringing it up to date unless someone is already
working on that.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
On Sun, 8 May 2011 14:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> that particular documentation file is clearly out of date. i can
> take a shot at bringing it up to date unless someone is already
> working on that.
First look at patches posted on linux-doc mailing list:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=130455335625331&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=130455337025346&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=130455338425367&w=2
thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
On Sun, 8 May 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2011 14:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >
> > that particular documentation file is clearly out of date. i can
> > take a shot at bringing it up to date unless someone is already
> > working on that.
>
> First look at patches posted on linux-doc mailing list:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=130455335625331&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=130455337025346&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=130455338425367&w=2
ah, and most of that matches pretty much what i was thinking of.
problem solved.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================