Hi
I'm testing the driver, based on Linux Kernel 2.6.37, for DICE's Fast
IrDA controller device. I'm using IrCOMM as the upper IrDA layer and
using PPP over it.
While testing, I'm getting the following backtrace repeatedly:
=====================================
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
/data/csd_sw/spear/drives_os/amitvi/spear/kernel/linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.c:85
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 0, name: swapper
Backtrace:
[<c0030b48>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0030c8c>]
(dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
r6:00000000 r5:c725a038 r4:c042c000
[<c0030c74>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c003b8b4>]
(__might_sleep+0xc8/0xe8)
[<c003b7ec>] (__might_sleep+0x0/0xe8) from [<c0332bec>]
(mutex_lock+0x24/0x44)
r4:c725a038
[<c0332bc8>] (mutex_lock+0x0/0x44) from [<c019f348>]
(tty_unthrottle+0x1c/0x64)
r4:c725a000
[<c019f32c>] (tty_unthrottle+0x0/0x64) from [<c0225b08>]
(ppp_asynctty_receive+0x484/0x4a4)
r5:c7816000 r4:c726a180
[<c0225684>] (ppp_asynctty_receive+0x0/0x4a4) from [<c030f944>]
(ircomm_tty_data_indication+0x138/0x184)
[<c030f80c>] (ircomm_tty_data_indication+0x0/0x184) from [<c030c8e8>]
(ircomm_data_indication+0x7c/0xb4)
r6:c7011300 r5:c726a900 r4:c7011300
[<c030c86c>] (ircomm_data_indication+0x0/0xb4) from [<c030d31c>]
(ircomm_process_data+0x110/0x160)
r5:c726a900 r4:c7011300
[<c030d20c>] (ircomm_process_data+0x0/0x160) from [<c030d6e0>]
(ircomm_state_conn+0x60/0xec)
r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:c726a900 r4:c7011300
[<c030d680>] (ircomm_state_conn+0x0/0xec) from [<c030d664>]
(ircomm_do_event+0x6c/0x88)
r6:c726a900 r5:00000009 r4:00000003
[<c030d5f8>] (ircomm_do_event+0x0/0x88) from [<c030e850>]
(ircomm_ttp_data_indication+0xbc/0xf4)
r7:00000002 r6:00000000 r5:c726a900 r4:c7011300
[<c030e794>] (ircomm_ttp_data_indication+0x0/0xf4) from [<c03048c0>]
(irttp_do_data_indication+0x44/0x8c)
r5:c726a900 r4:c79f3200
[<c030487c>] (irttp_do_data_indication+0x0/0x8c) from [<c03049b4>]
(irttp_run_rx_queue+0xac/0x318)
r6:c726a900 r5:00000000 r4:c79f3200
[<c0304908>] (irttp_run_rx_queue+0x0/0x318) from [<c0306194>]
(irttp_data_indication+0x90/0xac)
[<c0306104>] (irttp_data_indication+0x0/0xac) from [<c02f8158>]
(irlmp_data_indication+0x5c/0x60)
r7:c726a900 r6:c7120022 r5:c71cb300 r4:c726a900
[<c02f80fc>] (irlmp_data_indication+0x0/0x60) from [<c02fad20>]
(irlmp_link_data_indication+0x2fc/0x35c)
r5:c72c2280 r4:c71cb300
[<c02faa24>] (irlmp_link_data_indication+0x0/0x35c) from [<c02fc0d4>]
(irlap_data_indication+0x38/0x3c)
[<c02fc09c>] (irlap_data_indication+0x0/0x3c) from [<c02ff434>]
(irlap_state_nrm_s+0x208/0x7e0)
r6:c7214400 r5:00000001 r4:00000010
[<c02ff22c>] (irlap_state_nrm_s+0x0/0x7e0) from [<c02fced8>]
(irlap_do_event+0x84/0x17c)
[<c02fce54>] (irlap_do_event+0x0/0x17c) from [<c02ffeb0>]
(irlap_driver_rcv+0x178/0xc34)
r8:c7214400 r7:c726a900 r6:c78e7800 r5:00000001 r4:00000000
[<c02ffd38>] (irlap_driver_rcv+0x0/0xc34) from [<c0287a3c>]
(__netif_receive_skb+0x348/0x39c)
r8:00000000 r7:00001700 r6:c78e7800 r5:c05ee8c4 r4:c726a900
[<c02876f4>] (__netif_receive_skb+0x0/0x39c) from [<c028aec4>]
(process_backlog+0x8c/0x154)
[<c028ae38>] (process_backlog+0x0/0x154) from [<c028aff8>]
(net_rx_action+0x6c/0x188)
[<c028af8c>] (net_rx_action+0x0/0x188) from [<c0046f94>]
(__do_softirq+0x84/0x118)
[<c0046f10>] (__do_softirq+0x0/0x118) from [<c00472a8>] (irq_exit+0x44/0x4c)
[<c0047264>] (irq_exit+0x0/0x4c) from [<c002c080>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x80/0xa0)
[<c002c000>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x0/0xa0) from [<c002cb50>] (__irq_svc+0x30/0x80)
Exception stack(0xc042df40 to 0xc042df88)
df40: 00000000 0005317f 0005217f 60000013 c042c000 c042fcdc c046418c
c042fcd0
df60: 0002661c 41069265 00026580 c042df94 600000d3 c042df88 c002e694
c002e6a0
df80: 60000013 ffffffff
r5:f1100000 r4:ffffffff
[<c002e670>] (default_idle+0x0/0x34) from [<c002e458>] (cpu_idle+0x60/0xa4)
[<c002e3f8>] (cpu_idle+0x0/0xa4) from [<c032d5c4>] (rest_init+0x5c/0x74)
r6:c0027e60 r5:c046415c r4:c0488aa4
[<c032d568>] (rest_init+0x0/0x74) from [<c0008a8c>]
(start_kernel+0x278/0x2e0)
[<c0008814>] (start_kernel+0x0/0x2e0) from [<00008034>] (0x8034)
=====================================
On analysis, I found that this is due to the change introduced in
tty_ioctl.c where the termios mutex is taken to protect against parallel
throttle/unthrottle. Probably IrCOMM stack code wasn't tested before
merging this patch.
Please suggest what should be done with the IrCOMM protocol stack code
to resolve this problem?
Thanks
~Amit Virdi
> On analysis, I found that this is due to the change introduced in
> tty_ioctl.c where the termios mutex is taken to protect against
> parallel throttle/unthrottle. Probably IrCOMM stack code wasn't
> tested before merging this patch.
>
> Please suggest what should be done with the IrCOMM protocol stack
> code to resolve this problem?
It looks like the comments are wrong
/*
* Just give it over to the line discipline. There is no need to
* involve the flip buffers, since we are not running in an
interrupt
* handler
*/
appears to be completely untrue
I suspect it just needs to use the tty_flip_buffer functions properly
instead of trying to do clever shortcuts
tty_insert_flip_string(self->tty, skb->data, skb->len);
tty_flip_buffer_push(self->tty);
Hey Alan,
On 5/10/2011 3:02 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On analysis, I found that this is due to the change introduced in
>> tty_ioctl.c where the termios mutex is taken to protect against
>> parallel throttle/unthrottle. Probably IrCOMM stack code wasn't
>> tested before merging this patch.
>>
>> Please suggest what should be done with the IrCOMM protocol stack
>> code to resolve this problem?
>
> It looks like the comments are wrong
>
> /*
> * Just give it over to the line discipline. There is no need to
> * involve the flip buffers, since we are not running in an
> interrupt
> * handler
> */
>
>
> appears to be completely untrue
>
> I suspect it just needs to use the tty_flip_buffer functions properly
> instead of trying to do clever shortcuts
>
>
> tty_insert_flip_string(self->tty, skb->data, skb->len);
> tty_flip_buffer_push(self->tty);
>
> .
>
I incorporated the change suggested by you and tested the stack again.
It is working perfectly fine - no stack trace is printed now. I'll be
sending the patch soon.
Thanks n Regards
Amit Virdi