2011-06-01 19:42:43

by Simon Wood

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor

This patch modifies the HID descriptor to allow the reporting of
the accelerometers and gyro via a joystick axis.
---
drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
index 936c911..5c930dc 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
#define SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB (1 << 1)
#define SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_BT (1 << 2)

+static const u8 sixaxis_rdesc_fixup[] = {
+ 0x95, 0x13, 0x09, 0x01, 0x81, 0x02, 0x95, 0x0C,
+ 0x81, 0x01, 0x75, 0x10, 0x95, 0x04, 0x26, 0xFF,
+ 0x03, 0x46, 0xFF, 0x03, 0x09, 0x01, 0x81, 0x02
+ };
+
struct sony_sc {
unsigned long quirks;
};
@@ -43,6 +49,11 @@ static __u8 *sony_report_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, __u8 *rdesc,
hid_info(hdev, "Fixing up Sony Vaio VGX report descriptor\n");
rdesc[55] = 0x06;
}
+ if ((sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB) &&
+ *rsize == 148 && rdesc[83] == 0x75) {
+ hid_info(hdev, "Fixing up Sony Sixaxis report descriptor\n");
+ memcpy((void *)&rdesc[83], (void *) &sixaxis_rdesc_fixup, sizeof(sixaxis_rdesc_fixup));
+ }
return rdesc;
}

--
1.7.4.1


2011-06-01 19:42:50

by Simon Wood

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sony_ff_byteswap_accelerometer

The accelerometers/gyro on the sixaxis are reported in the wrong
endianness (ie. not compatible with HID), so this patch intercepts
the report and swaps the appropriate bytes over.

Accelerometers are scaled with a nominal value of +/-4000 = 1G,
maximum value would be around +/-32768 = 8G.

Gyro on my device always reports -32768, might need some calibration
set within the controller.
---
drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
index 5c930dc..f219746 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
@@ -57,6 +57,24 @@ static __u8 *sony_report_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, __u8 *rdesc,
return rdesc;
}

+/* Sixaxis HID report has acclerometers/gyro with MSByte first, this has
+ * to be BYTE_SWAPPED before passing up to joystick interface
+ */
+static int sony_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report, __u8 *rd, int size)
+{
+ struct sony_sc *sc = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
+
+ if ((sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB) &&
+ rd[0] == 0x01 && size == 49) {
+ swap(rd[41], rd[42]);
+ swap(rd[43], rd[44]);
+ swap(rd[45], rd[46]);
+ swap(rd[47], rd[48]);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* The Sony Sixaxis does not handle HID Output Reports on the Interrupt EP
* like it should according to usbhid/hid-core.c::usbhid_output_raw_report()
@@ -205,6 +223,7 @@ static struct hid_driver sony_driver = {
.probe = sony_probe,
.remove = sony_remove,
.report_fixup = sony_report_fixup,
+ .raw_event = sony_raw_event
};

static int __init sony_init(void)
--
1.7.4.1

2011-06-01 19:54:52

by Antonio Ospite

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor

On Mon, 23 May 2011 03:19:58 -0700
Simon Wood <[email protected]> wrote:

> This patch modifies the HID descriptor to allow the reporting of
> the accelerometers and gyro via a joystick axis.

I am going to test it tomorrow, but for now I notice that the
Signed-off-by is missing. Wait for the test before resending tho.

Plus, the short commit message can be improved a little bit, and the
long commit message could use the classic imperative form used in kernel
commit messages: "Modify the HID descriptor to...", but these are just
suggestions.

Same comments for patch 2/2.

Thanks,
Antonio

> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> index 936c911..5c930dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
> #define SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB (1 << 1)
> #define SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_BT (1 << 2)
>
> +static const u8 sixaxis_rdesc_fixup[] = {
> + 0x95, 0x13, 0x09, 0x01, 0x81, 0x02, 0x95, 0x0C,
> + 0x81, 0x01, 0x75, 0x10, 0x95, 0x04, 0x26, 0xFF,
> + 0x03, 0x46, 0xFF, 0x03, 0x09, 0x01, 0x81, 0x02
> + };
> +
> struct sony_sc {
> unsigned long quirks;
> };
> @@ -43,6 +49,11 @@ static __u8 *sony_report_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, __u8 *rdesc,
> hid_info(hdev, "Fixing up Sony Vaio VGX report descriptor\n");
> rdesc[55] = 0x06;
> }
> + if ((sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB) &&
> + *rsize == 148 && rdesc[83] == 0x75) {
> + hid_info(hdev, "Fixing up Sony Sixaxis report descriptor\n");
> + memcpy((void *)&rdesc[83], (void *) &sixaxis_rdesc_fixup, sizeof(sixaxis_rdesc_fixup));
> + }
> return rdesc;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>

--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.92 kB)
(No filename) (198.00 B)
Download all attachments

2011-06-01 19:53:33

by Antonio Ospite

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sony_ff_byteswap_accelerometer

On Mon, 23 May 2011 03:19:59 -0700
Simon Wood <[email protected]> wrote:

> The accelerometers/gyro on the sixaxis are reported in the wrong
> endianness (ie. not compatible with HID), so this patch intercepts
> the report and swaps the appropriate bytes over.
>
> Accelerometers are scaled with a nominal value of +/-4000 = 1G,
> maximum value would be around +/-32768 = 8G.
>
> Gyro on my device always reports -32768, might need some calibration
> set within the controller.
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>

Should this one have Marcin as the original author or at least as the
first Signed-off-by, and an additional Signed-off-by you Simon?

Thanks,
Antonio

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> index 5c930dc..f219746 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,24 @@ static __u8 *sony_report_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, __u8 *rdesc,
> return rdesc;
> }
>
> +/* Sixaxis HID report has acclerometers/gyro with MSByte first, this has
> + * to be BYTE_SWAPPED before passing up to joystick interface
> + */
> +static int sony_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report, __u8 *rd, int size)
> +{
> + struct sony_sc *sc = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
> +
> + if ((sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB) &&
> + rd[0] == 0x01 && size == 49) {
> + swap(rd[41], rd[42]);
> + swap(rd[43], rd[44]);
> + swap(rd[45], rd[46]);
> + swap(rd[47], rd[48]);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The Sony Sixaxis does not handle HID Output Reports on the Interrupt EP
> * like it should according to usbhid/hid-core.c::usbhid_output_raw_report()
> @@ -205,6 +223,7 @@ static struct hid_driver sony_driver = {
> .probe = sony_probe,
> .remove = sony_remove,
> .report_fixup = sony_report_fixup,
> + .raw_event = sony_raw_event
> };
>
> static int __init sony_init(void)
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>


--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


Attachments:
(No filename) (2.15 kB)
(No filename) (198.00 B)
Download all attachments

2011-06-07 13:32:19

by Jiri Kosina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Antonio Ospite wrote:

> On Mon, 23 May 2011 03:19:58 -0700
> Simon Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This patch modifies the HID descriptor to allow the reporting of
> > the accelerometers and gyro via a joystick axis.
>
> I am going to test it tomorrow, but for now I notice that the
> Signed-off-by is missing. Wait for the test before resending tho.
>
> Plus, the short commit message can be improved a little bit, and the
> long commit message could use the classic imperative form used in kernel
> commit messages: "Modify the HID descriptor to...", but these are just
> suggestions.
>
> Same comments for patch 2/2.

Antonio,

thanks for the (valid) comments.

What was the result of your testing of the patches, please?

Simon, would you please, once Antionio adds his Tested-by:, to resend with
proper authorship and Signed-off-by?

Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

2011-06-07 13:32:57

by Jiri Kosina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor

On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> Simon, would you please, once Antionio adds his Tested-by:, to resend with
> proper authorship and Signed-off-by?

Ah, I see you already did, in a separate thread.

So I'd just like to wait for Tested-by: from Antonion, and will then
apply.

thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

2011-06-07 14:15:40

by Antonio Ospite

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor

On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:32:15 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Antonio Ospite wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 03:19:58 -0700
> > Simon Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch modifies the HID descriptor to allow the reporting of
> > > the accelerometers and gyro via a joystick axis.
> >
> > I am going to test it tomorrow, but for now I notice that the
> > Signed-off-by is missing. Wait for the test before resending tho.
> >
> > Plus, the short commit message can be improved a little bit, and the
> > long commit message could use the classic imperative form used in kernel
> > commit messages: "Modify the HID descriptor to...", but these are just
> > suggestions.
[...]

> What was the result of your testing of the patches, please?
>

There has been an off-list discussion and I think Simon is going to send
the patches once again in a form which amends the HID descriptor even
when the Sixaxis is connected via Bluetooth.

I will retest and add the Tested-by on those.

Regards,
Antonio

--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.25 kB)
(No filename) (198.00 B)
Download all attachments

2011-06-07 15:53:15

by Simon Wood

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor


>
> What was the result of your testing of the patches, please?
>
> Simon, would you please, once Antionio adds his Tested-by:, to resend with
> proper authorship and Signed-off-by?

Jiri: I think that we have a plan... I'll resend a patch (V4) in the next
couple of days.

Antionio: Do I just add 'tested-by' on your behalf?

Simon

2011-06-07 19:44:03

by Antonio Ospite

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sony_ff_hid_descriptor

On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:53:08 -0400
[email protected] wrote:

>
> >
> > What was the result of your testing of the patches, please?
> >
> > Simon, would you please, once Antonio adds his Tested-by:, to resend with
> > proper authorship and Signed-off-by?
>
> Jiri: I think that we have a plan... I'll resend a patch (V4) in the next
> couple of days.
>
> Antonio: Do I just add 'tested-by' on your behalf?
>

I am going to test (and use) the patches anyways, so I think I can send
the tested-by mails, no problem. :)

Thanks,
Antonio

--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


Attachments:
(No filename) (767.00 B)
(No filename) (198.00 B)
Download all attachments