> i think it makes sense for us to have platform_devm_request_irq() and
> similar things. i'll take care.
I'll try, too. Then we can compare and learn from that.
> PS: as the man maintaining embedded systems of the i2c subsystem,
> would you comment the CSR i2c driver which has been there waiting for
> a long time?
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07081.html
Relax, you sent that only two days ago.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
2012/2/1 Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>:
>
>> i think it makes sense for us to have platform_devm_request_irq() and
>> similar things. i'll take care.
>
> I'll try, too. Then we can compare and learn from that.
well, thanks.
>
>> PS: as the man maintaining embedded systems of the i2c subsystem,
>> would you comment the CSR i2c driver which has been there waiting for
>> a long time?
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07081.html
>
> Relax, you sent that only two days ago.
the v5 is sent two days ago with deleting only one line, v1-v4 has
been there 3 monthes :-)
i was not complaining you haven't sent comments for v5.
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-barry