2012-02-13 05:40:14

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the dma-mapping tree

Hi all,

After merging the dma-mapping tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c: In function 'vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent':
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:500:21: error: 'struct dma_map_ops' has no member named 'alloc_coherent'
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c: In function 'vio_dma_iommu_free_coherent':
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:514:15: error: 'struct dma_map_ops' has no member named 'free_coherent'
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c: At top level:
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:615:2: error: unknown field 'alloc_coherent' specified in initializer
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:615:2: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:615:2: error: (near initialization for 'vio_dma_mapping_ops.alloc') [-Werror]
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:616:2: error: unknown field 'free_coherent' specified in initializer
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:616:2: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:616:2: error: (near initialization for 'vio_dma_mapping_ops.free') [-Werror]

I have dropped the dma-mapping tree for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.17 kB)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments

2012-02-13 07:31:44

by Kyungmin Park

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the dma-mapping tree

Hi,

It's maybe missing modify arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c at that time.

following patch will fix it.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
index 8b08629..b12a77a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static void vio_cmo_balance(struct work_struct *work)
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
index 8b08629..b12a77a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static void vio_cmo_balance(struct work_struct *work)
}

static void *vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
- dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag)
+ dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
{
struct vio_dev *viodev = to_vio_dev(dev);
void *ret;
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static void *vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev
return NULL;
}

- ret = dma_iommu_ops.alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flag);
+ ret = dma_iommu_ops.alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, flag, attrs);
if (unlikely(ret == NULL)) {
vio_cmo_dealloc(viodev, roundup(size, PAGE_SIZE));
atomic_inc(&viodev->cmo.allocs_failed);
@@ -507,11 +507,11 @@ static void *vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *d
}

static void vio_dma_iommu_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
- void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
+ void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
{
struct vio_dev *viodev = to_vio_dev(dev);

- dma_iommu_ops.free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_handle);
+ dma_iommu_ops.free(dev, size, vaddr, dma_handle, attrs);

vio_cmo_dealloc(viodev, roundup(size, PAGE_SIZE));
}
@@ -612,8 +612,8 @@ static u64 vio_dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
}

struct dma_map_ops vio_dma_mapping_ops = {
- .alloc_coherent = vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent,
- .free_coherent = vio_dma_iommu_free_coherent,
+ .alloc = vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent,
+ .free = vio_dma_iommu_free_coherent,
.map_sg = vio_dma_iommu_map_sg,
.unmap_sg = vio_dma_iommu_unmap_sg,
.map_page = vio_dma_iommu_map_page,

On 2/13/12, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the dma-mapping tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c: In function 'vio_dma_iommu_alloc_coherent':
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:500:21: error: 'struct dma_map_ops' has no member
> named 'alloc_coherent'
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c: In function 'vio_dma_iommu_free_coherent':
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:514:15: error: 'struct dma_map_ops' has no member
> named 'free_coherent'
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c: At top level:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:615:2: error: unknown field 'alloc_coherent'
> specified in initializer
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:615:2: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type [-Werror]
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:615:2: error: (near initialization for
> 'vio_dma_mapping_ops.alloc') [-Werror]
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:616:2: error: unknown field 'free_coherent'
> specified in initializer
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:616:2: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type [-Werror]
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c:616:2: error: (near initialization for
> 'vio_dma_mapping_ops.free') [-Werror]
>
> I have dropped the dma-mapping tree for today.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
>

2012-02-13 15:05:33

by Marek Szyprowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the dma-mapping tree

Hi Stephen,

On Monday, February 13, 2012 6:40 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> After merging the dma-mapping tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

(snipped)

I'm sorry for the problems. I've updated patches to fix these issues, as
well as similar problems with MIPS and Hexagon architecture.

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center