On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 00:03 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 13:30 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
> > (As a side note, I realize the CC list has ballooned. In the next
> > rev, I'll pare it down to active participants and the appropriate
> > lists and not just the get_maintainers.pl output!)
> Add kernel-hardening to CC and remove me and Kees ;)
Should that list be added to MAINTAINERS or
Documentation/ somewhere?
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:19 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 00:03 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 13:30 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
> > > (As a side note, I realize the CC list has ballooned. In the next
> > > rev, I'll pare it down to active participants and the appropriate
> > > lists and not just the get_maintainers.pl output!)
> > Add kernel-hardening to CC and remove me and Kees ;)
>
> Should that list be added to MAINTAINERS or
> Documentation/ somewhere?
Probably yes, but we haven't fully agreed on what are the formal
criterias of k-h posting. Currently these are either discussion of
not-yet-merged security features or general security problems of Linux.
I guess we should more clearly state the role of k-h to place k-h in
MAINTAINERS.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:19:03PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 00:03 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 13:30 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
> > > (As a side note, I realize the CC list has ballooned. In the next
> > > rev, I'll pare it down to active participants and the appropriate
> > > lists and not just the get_maintainers.pl output!)
> > Add kernel-hardening to CC and remove me and Kees ;)
>
> Should that list be added to MAINTAINERS or
> Documentation/ somewhere?
FWIW, I like getting direct emails in addition to the mailing list emails.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net