V2: accepted comments I got on V1; rewritten the driver to be generic;
made it tristate instead of boolean. Rebased on new next.
This patch set introduces use of AMBA devices under a PCI bridge.
The device table in the driver include all the devices that we'll be
able to run using AMBA drivers.
To compile AMBA under x86, though I need <asm/sizes.h>,
which is moved to <linux/sizes.h> as suggested earlier.
I'm hereby volunteering to handle the moving of the various users
of <asm/sizes.h> to <linux/sizes.h>; this set only moves the ARM core
files and the ones that I need under x86.
The whole patch set is sent to the same set of recipients:
all relevant lists, Russell King (for arm), Greg-KH (for uart) and
Arnd Bergmann (for generic include).
With this set in place (plus a clok API not included here) I have
4 serial ports working.
Success strings:
spusa.root# uname -r
3.4.0-next-20120528-00016-g1e5853d
spusa.root# dmesg | grep ttyA
amba-0000:03:00.5: ttyAMA0 at MMIO 0xcf400000 (irq = 64) is a PL011 rev3
amba-0000:03:00.6: ttyAMA1 at MMIO 0xcec00000 (irq = 65) is a PL011 rev3
amba-0000:03:00.7: ttyAMA2 at MMIO 0xce400000 (irq = 66) is a PL011 rev3
amba-0000:04:00.5: ttyAMA3 at MMIO 0xd3400000 (irq = 71) is a PL011 rev3
spusa.root# grep -B2 pl011 /proc/iomem
ce400000-ce7fffff : 0000:03:00.7
ce400000-ce400fff : amba-0000:03:00.7
ce400000-ce400fff : uart-pl011
--
cec00000-ceffffff : 0000:03:00.6
cec00000-cec00fff : amba-0000:03:00.6
cec00000-cec00fff : uart-pl011
--
cf400000-cf7fffff : 0000:03:00.5
cf400000-cf400fff : amba-0000:03:00.5
cf400000-cf400fff : uart-pl011
--
d3400000-d37fffff : 0000:04:00.5
d3400000-d3400fff : amba-0000:04:00.5
d3400000-d3400fff : uart-pl011
Alessandro Rubini (6):
sizes.h: move from asm-generic to <linux/sizes.h>
amba: use the new linux/sizes.h
ARM: use the new linux/sizes.h
serial: use the new linux/sizes.h
x86: add CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, selected by STA2X11
drivers/amba: add support for a PCI bridge
arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++
drivers/Kconfig | 2 +
drivers/amba/Kconfig | 10 ++++
drivers/amba/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/amba/bus.c | 2 +-
drivers/amba/pci-amba.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 2 +-
include/asm-generic/sizes.h | 49 +-------------------
include/linux/sizes.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
14 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/amba/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/amba/pci-amba.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/sizes.h
--
1.7.7.2
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Alessandro Rubini <[email protected]> wrote:
> V2: accepted comments I got on V1; rewritten the driver to be generic;
> ? ?made it tristate instead of boolean. Rebased on new next.
This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
I think this patch set could go through Arnd as arch maintainer?
It's fun with these cross-arch things. You'll need an ACK from
Russell first.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Sunday 10 June 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Alessandro Rubini <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > V2: accepted comments I got on V1; rewritten the driver to be generic;
> > made it tristate instead of boolean. Rebased on new next.
>
> This looks good to me.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>
> I think this patch set could go through Arnd as arch maintainer?
> It's fun with these cross-arch things. You'll need an ACK from
> Russell first.
I don't think it has much to do with code I maintain. Russell
as the Primecell maintainer is the right person to take it through
his tree.
Arnd
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:28:22 +0000
Arnd Bergmann:
> I don't think it has much to do with code I maintain. Russell
> as the Primecell maintainer is the right person to take it through
> his tree.
Russell, is there some action I shall take? I suspect your email-based
patch system is over by now, or should I send patches in there?
thanks
/alessandro
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Alessandro Rubini <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:28:22 +0000
>
> Arnd Bergmann:
>> I don't think it has much to do with code I maintain. Russell
>> as the Primecell maintainer is the right person to take it through
>> his tree.
>
> Russell, is there some action I shall take? I suspect your email-based
> patch system is over by now, or should I send patches in there?
I'm always using the web interface, it works like a charm:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
Yours,
Linus Walleij