Add the device ID for supporting the Macbook Pro 2012 'MacBookPro10,1'.
The bluetooth device presents itself as:
T: Bus=02 Lev=04 Prnt=04 Port=02 Cnt=03 Dev#= 8 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=05ac ProdID=8286 Rev=00.86
S: Manufacturer=Apple Inc.
S: Product=Bluetooth USB Host Controller
C: #Ifs= 4 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=0mA
I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
Patch originally written and tested by clipcarl (forums.opensuse.org).
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index e272214..61f4eb7 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ static struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = {
/* Apple MacMini5,1 */
{ USB_DEVICE(0x05ac, 0x8281) },
+ /* Apple MacBookPro10,1 */
+ { USB_DEVICE(0x05ac, 0x8286) },
+
/* AVM BlueFRITZ! USB v2.0 */
{ USB_DEVICE(0x057c, 0x3800) },
--
1.7.10.4
Hi Daniel,
> Add the device ID for supporting the Macbook Pro 2012 'MacBookPro10,1'.
> The bluetooth device presents itself as:
>
> T: Bus=02 Lev=04 Prnt=04 Port=02 Cnt=03 Dev#= 8 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
> D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
> P: Vendor=05ac ProdID=8286 Rev=00.86
> S: Manufacturer=Apple Inc.
> S: Product=Bluetooth USB Host Controller
> C: #Ifs= 4 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=0mA
> I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
> I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
> I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>
> Patch originally written and tested by clipcarl (forums.opensuse.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]>
> ---
I did not sign off this patch. The author is different, the subject
and wording is different, the credits are different. It looks like you
sent a patch which I subsequently added my SOB to, but that is not the
case. Please do not do that.
If you meant to add your blessing somehow, or if you are the unknown
original author, adding an originally-by or tested-by or reviewed-by
would be more appropriate.
Either way, the patch is moot; With Gustavo's commit d81a5d195, the
plan is to support this machine via a more generic device entry.
Thanks.
Henrik
On 18 August 2012 01:21, Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>> Add the device ID for supporting the Macbook Pro 2012 'MacBookPro10,1'.
>> The bluetooth device presents itself as:
>>
>> T: Bus=02 Lev=04 Prnt=04 Port=02 Cnt=03 Dev#= 8 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
>> D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
>> P: Vendor=05ac ProdID=8286 Rev=00.86
>> S: Manufacturer=Apple Inc.
>> S: Product=Bluetooth USB Host Controller
>> C: #Ifs= 4 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=0mA
>> I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>> I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>> I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
>> I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>>
>> Patch originally written and tested by clipcarl (forums.opensuse.org).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> I did not sign off this patch. The author is different, the subject
> and wording is different, the credits are different. It looks like you
> sent a patch which I subsequently added my SOB to, but that is not the
> case. Please do not do that.
>
> If you meant to add your blessing somehow, or if you are the unknown
> original author, adding an originally-by or tested-by or reviewed-by
> would be more appropriate.
>
> Either way, the patch is moot; With Gustavo's commit d81a5d195, the
> plan is to support this machine via a more generic device entry.
Apologies; my intent was to update your patch [1] description with the
output Marcel asked (as I have the hardware), but I clarified the
subject and description also. The actual content is identical of
course, but I should have cited your post.
Great to know Gustavo has added support.
Thanks!
Daniel
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/10/150
--
Daniel J Blueman