2012-10-18 19:41:30

by Dave Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] print reason for failure in kcmp_test

I was curious why sys_kcmp wasn't working, which led me to the testcase.
It turned out I hadn't enabled CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in the kernel I was testing.
Add a decoding of errno to the testcase to make that obvious.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c
index 358cc6b..fa4f1b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* This one should return same fd */
ret = sys_kcmp(pid1, pid2, KCMP_FILE, fd1, fd1);
if (ret) {
- printf("FAIL: 0 expected but %d returned\n", ret);
+ printf("FAIL: 0 expected but %d returned (%s)\n",
+ ret, strerror(errno));
ret = -1;
} else
printf("PASS: 0 returned as expected\n");
@@ -80,7 +81,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* Compare with self */
ret = sys_kcmp(pid1, pid1, KCMP_VM, 0, 0);
if (ret) {
- printf("FAIL: 0 expected but %li returned\n", ret);
+ printf("FAIL: 0 expected but %li returned (%s)\n",
+ ret, strerror(errno));
ret = -1;
} else
printf("PASS: 0 returned as expected\n");


2012-10-18 19:59:47

by Cyrill Gorcunov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] print reason for failure in kcmp_test

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:41:04PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I was curious why sys_kcmp wasn't working, which led me to the testcase.
> It turned out I hadn't enabled CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in the kernel I was testing.
> Add a decoding of errno to the testcase to make that obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>

Thanks Dave!