2013-03-04 20:09:39

by tmhikaru

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmi_scan: Refactor dmi_scan_machine(), {smbios,dmi}_present()

Forgive me for bothering you about this again, I know that -stable
has a policy of only accepting patches once Linus has accepted them
upstream, but I'm curious what's going on here. Is there something I could
help with to move this along? I haven't seen any discussion about it since
Feb 16.

Of course this assumes that I have not missed the patch going in...
Tim McGrath

Attachments:
(No filename) (376.00 B)
 (No filename) (482.00 B)
 Download all attachments

2013-03-05 05:23:12

by Ben Hutchings

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmi_scan: Refactor dmi_scan_machine(), {smbios,dmi}_present()

On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:09 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> Forgive me for bothering you about this again, I know that -stable
> has a policy of only accepting patches once Linus has accepted them
> upstream, but I'm curious what's going on here. Is there something I could
> help with to move this along? I haven't seen any discussion about it since
> Feb 16.
>
> Of course this assumes that I have not missed the patch going in...
> Tim McGrath

Andrew, did you see these dmi_scan patches? Should I repost them?

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.

Attachments:
signature.asc (828.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part