On Tuesday 26 February 2013, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tim Gardner (2013-02-26 09:34:12)
> > commit 72480014b86c8b51fb51c5c6a0525876055c37c7 (clk: vt8500: Fix device clock
> > divisor calculations) introduced a compile error in the naming of a variable in
> > vt8500_dclk_set_rate(). It looks like a simple cut and paste error.
> >
> > Cc: Mike Turquette <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <[email protected]>
>
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for the fix. I already have a fix for this issue in my clk-fixes
> branch. In fact I forgot to bundle this one and another mxs fix in my
> 3.9 pull request so I'll send a follow-up bugfix branch after 3.9-rc1 is
> out.
>
It seems this hasn't happened yet. I also don't see the patch in linux-next.
Is this patch still on your radar?
Arnd
Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2013-03-11 15:07:32)
> On Tuesday 26 February 2013, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Tim Gardner (2013-02-26 09:34:12)
> > > commit 72480014b86c8b51fb51c5c6a0525876055c37c7 (clk: vt8500: Fix device clock
> > > divisor calculations) introduced a compile error in the naming of a variable in
> > > vt8500_dclk_set_rate(). It looks like a simple cut and paste error.
> > >
> > > Cc: Mike Turquette <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <[email protected]>
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > Thanks for the fix. I already have a fix for this issue in my clk-fixes
> > branch. In fact I forgot to bundle this one and another mxs fix in my
> > 3.9 pull request so I'll send a follow-up bugfix branch after 3.9-rc1 is
> > out.
> >
>
> It seems this hasn't happened yet. I also don't see the patch in linux-next.
> Is this patch still on your radar?
>
Arnd,
Yes it is. I haven't pushed a new branch out since 3.9-rc1 due to LCE
and vacation after that. This fix and other pending patches will get
pulled in this week.
Regards,
Mike
> Arnd
On Sunday 17 March 2013, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Yes it is. I haven't pushed a new branch out since 3.9-rc1 due to LCE
> and vacation after that. This fix and other pending patches will get
> pulled in this week.
>
I've actually put it into the arm-soc bug fix queue now, since I did not
hear back from you and it never showed up in linux-next.
Arnd