Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
one-by-one during its depelopment.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Joseph Lo <[email protected]>
---
drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c b/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
index 093c435..1f44e56 100644
--- a/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
+++ b/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ int tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(struct device_node *dn)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tegra_ahb_enable_smmu);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int tegra_ahb_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
int i;
--
1.8.1.5
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
> cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
> when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
> one-by-one during its depelopment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Joseph Lo <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c b/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
> index 093c435..1f44e56 100644
> --- a/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
> +++ b/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ int tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(struct device_node *dn)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tegra_ahb_enable_smmu);
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> static int tegra_ahb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> int i;
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
> cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
> when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
> one-by-one during its depelopment.
Looks fine to me.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
I assume Russell will want this to go through his patch tracker.
Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote @ Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:23:38 +0100:
> On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
> > cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
> > when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
> > one-by-one during its depelopment.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
>
> I assume Russell will want this to go through his patch tracker.
FYI: Patch has been accepted as patch 7675/1