On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Add device-tree bindings to the AS3711 regulator and backlight drivers.
Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Hi all
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Add device-tree bindings to the AS3711 regulator and backlight drivers.
>
> Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
This patch has been submitted more than a month ago and only has got one
reviewed-be (thanks) and no comments otherwise. The patch touches multiple
subsystems, so, it is a bit difficult to decide via which tree it should
be pushed. Since the least trivial and largest portion of the patch is
backlight-related, maybe Samuel could add his ack and then Andrew could
pull it via his tree?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
Hi Guennadi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:40:15PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi all
>
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Add device-tree bindings to the AS3711 regulator and backlight drivers.
> >
> > Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
>
> This patch has been submitted more than a month ago and only has got one
> reviewed-be (thanks) and no comments otherwise. The patch touches multiple
> subsystems, so, it is a bit difficult to decide via which tree it should
> be pushed. Since the least trivial and largest portion of the patch is
> backlight-related, maybe Samuel could add his ack and then Andrew could
> pull it via his tree?
We could do that, yes. But it also seems to me that this patch could be split
into 3 different ones that could go in via their own trees. Is there a runtime
dependency that I'm missing here ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/